This bug was fixed in the package optee-os - 4.3.0-1ubuntu2
---
optee-os (4.3.0-1ubuntu2) oracular; urgency=medium
* d/rules: remove elf-package-metadata.specs from LDFLAGS (LP:
#2074012).
-- Mitchell Dzurick Wed, 24 Jul 2024
21:42:42 -0700
** Changed in: optee-os (Ubuntu)
This is fixed in -proposed now.
** Changed in: optee-os (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074012
Title:
arm64 build failure
To manage noti
Worth to note that I just decided to build 4.2.0 from source on arm64,
and it fails with the same exact issue. Therefore, this isn't due to a
change in the package itself, but a change in the build environment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
The package builds, but I'm unsure if it's fine to just not link against
the elf-package-metadata.specs. I'm just not familiar enough with that
file and the effects of removing it. Some useful information seems to
come from[0] about this file, which leads me to believe it's okay to
remove, but can
I got a local build working by just removing
"-specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs" from LDFLAGS. I'm
not sure at the moment if this is safe to do as I'm not very familiar
with this file, but I assume since the debian build does not, it could
be fine. Linked a MP on hold with the chang
Tested a build with the new binutils currently in -proposed and still
seeing a failure.
$ apt-cache policy binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu:
Installed: 2.42.90.20240720-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.42.90.20240720-2ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.42.90.20240720-2ubuntu1 100
Just installed binutils from -proposed and testing that build now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074012
Title:
arm64 build failure
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
I think we need a newer binutils version, but I'm not sure right now.
Looking at the debian build logs[0] one large difference is that
LDFLAGS='' in debian, but is set to LDFLAGS='-Bsymbolic-functions
-specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs' for us.
Thankfully this is easy to reproduce o
