This bug was fixed in the package ipvsadm - 1:1.31-1ubuntu0.1
---
ipvsadm (1:1.31-1ubuntu0.1) noble; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/fix-build-flags.patch:
Don't overwrite compiler/linker flags inherited from the environment.
It's preventing the package to be built with hard
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949
Title:
[SRU] Missing frame pointers on Noble
To manage notifi
I verified in the build logs [1] that ipvsadm was NOT built with frame
pointers on ppc64el and s390x.
I also executed the test plan from the LP bug description with both
versions of ipvsadm (from release and from proposed) and verified that
they produce the same results.
[1] - https://launchpad.
The autopkgtest failed due to infrastructure issues, it worked now
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/run/084534a2-2f3a-46f0-ae77-e9ac4039b7a8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949
Title:
Hello Danilo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ipvsadm into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/1:1.31-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Re-sponsored without the HAVE_NL=1 cleanup.
see,
https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+git/ipvsadm/+merge/469312/comments/1272379
** Changed in: ipvsadm (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
> While this is not related to the frame-pointers, I tried to avoid
having to change the commits I cherry-picked from Debian and this change
was part of it.
SRUs should be minimal by policy, and we do not include unrelated
changes. Changing the commits should not be a problem in principle, or
is t
Hi Danilo,
Thanks for the clarifications.
So, I understood that this change is then unrelated to ppc64el/s390x
frame pointer considerations, and should just enable frame pointers on
this package for the objective of having frame pointers enabled in
Noble. (And ppc64el/s390x would have adjustments
Hi Mauricio,
so, about frame-pointers and ppc64/s390x: it will be handled on dpkg
[1]. If plans to rebuild the archive on Noble exist, it will be done
when dpkg is patched, for now everything is being built with -no-omit-
frame-pointer.
About libnl, it was already used by ipvsadm. The package mai
Danilo,
Please, could you also clarify why libnl is needed/related to this SRU?
AFAICT, it is not related to the build flags changes (and deviates from
the bug title and description/sru template), and is introducing a
feature in an SRU, which needs some more review to assess behavior
changes for
Hi Danilo,
Just to clarify,
IIUC comments #10 and #11, the plan re: ppc64el/s390x (which should have
frame pointers disabled) is
1) allow this package to use build flags from the environment (this SRU)
2) build it now (ppc64el/s390x would still have frame pointers enabled)
3) change dpkg build f
yes, this looks fine, checked the build logs that the flags are passed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949
Title:
[SRU] Missing frame pointers on Noble
To manage notifications ab
Steve and/or Matthias, please could you comment?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949
Title:
[SRU] Missing frame pointers on Noble
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
Hi Andreas, this will be (eventually) done in dpkg. All I'm doing in
this SRU is making the package build with whatever flags the framework
passes to it.
** Changed in: ipvsadm (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Shouldn't we skip this s390x and ppc64el?
** Changed in: ipvsadm (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949
Title:
[SRU] Missing frame poi
The issue is already fixed in Oracular, as of 1:1.31-3
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-
ipvsadm/-/commit/d066b671dc63fa8db402d0f8bc7d2ab3b655a30c
** Changed in: ipvsadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
16 matches
Mail list logo
