** Changed in: mythbuntu
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
LIRC update overwrites config file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
This bug was fixed in the package lirc - 0.8.3-0ubuntu2
---
lirc (0.8.3-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low
* debian/patches/25_upstream_2.6.26.patch:
- Fix lirc-modules-source compilation on 2.6.26 by pulling some
patches from CVS (LP: #247233)
* debian/rules:
- Install
Sponsors, please pull the latest copy of the bzr branch linked on this
bug for sponsorship.
--
LIRC update overwrites config file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
this is fixed in bzr #30
** Changed in: lirc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mario Limonciello (superm1)
** Changed in: lirc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: mythbuntu
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
LIR
** Changed in: mythbuntu
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: New => Confirmed
--
LIRC update overwrites config file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
As had been predicted in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/239938 - warning
months ago that
> the automatic replacement of /etc/lirc/lircd.conf without warning
might lead to final loss of one's configuration
(see also the comment there) - this should be fixed to avoid deleting
w
I ran the config 2x, so now I don't have the "backup" to revert to.
--
LIRC update overwrites config file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
mvisa wrote:
> I experienced this too. What is the point of overwriting working configs
> without informing the user? Is the old config incompatible with the new
> binary? Doesn't seem to be that way as the new config files did not work
> for me AT ALL. When i replaced with old config everything wo
I experienced this too. What is the point of overwriting working configs
without informing the user? Is the old config incompatible with the new
binary? Doesn't seem to be that way as the new config files did not work
for me AT ALL. When i replaced with old config everything works as
before.
What'
When the latest version of lirc applies it doesn't check for an existing
lircd.conf and replaces it when you select a remote, it should be known
to the user that it is doing this.
** Also affects: lirc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lirc (Ubuntu)
Status
10 matches
Mail list logo
