[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2025-01-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package sssd - 2.10.1-2ubuntu2 --- sssd (2.10.1-2ubuntu2) plucky; urgency=medium * Reintroduce faketime on armhf, it might be fixed now (LP: #2059078) -- Gianfranco Costamagna Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:16:44 +0100 ** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu) Stat

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2025-01-23 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
faketime migrated, I reverted sssd change, let's see what happens ** Changed in: faketime (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059078 Title: pr

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-12-31 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059078 Title: proposed-migrati

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-04-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package bash - 5.2.21-2ubuntu4 --- bash (5.2.21-2ubuntu4) noble; urgency=medium * No-change rebuild for CVE-2024-3094 -- Steve Langasek Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:41:03 + ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** CVE added: https

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I added an sssd task due to the workaround we had to add to it in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2058576 (we don't install faketime). Should faketime be fixed, then we can revert that change in sssd. ** Also affects: sssd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-04-04 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: faketime (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04-beta -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059078 Title: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1 To manage no

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-04-02 Thread Simon Chopin
What now remains to be done is to heavily patch faketime to, when on armhf: 1/ use the proper symbols from glibc (e.g. __clock_gettime64 instead of __clock_gettime) 2/ expose those symbols instead of the legacy 32-bit ones. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-03-26 Thread Simon Chopin
Oh, hang on. The bash build has apparently been uploaded just a day after the t64 gcc, which means gcc was presumably still building when the bash build started: gcc-13 armhf 13.2.0-13ubuntu1 (from the bash build logs) A bash rebuild should "fix" this somewhat. Well, at least a little bit. ** Al

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-03-26 Thread Simon Chopin
The failure is because bash, for some reason, still links against gettimeofday rather than __gettimeofday64, and calls that to seed its internal random number generator. I still can't figure out why it's using the old version, though. ubuntu@noble-armhf:~$ readelf -W -s a.out | grep timeof # a sim

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Unsurprisingly, there are some symbol differences. # diff -u <(objdump -T /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/faketime/libfaketime.so.1 | grep '\.text' | cut -b34- | sort -u) <(objdump -T ./src/libfaketime.so.1 | grep '\.text' | cut -b34- | sort -u)@@ -1,50 +1,51 @@ Base__clock_gettime +Base

[Bug 2059078] Re: proposed-migration for faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1

2024-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed: - faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1 is stuck in -proposed. + faketime 0.9.10-2.1ubuntu1 is stuck in -proposed with build failures on + armhf. + + On armhf, the testsuite confusingly fails with a stack smash error. But + this error happens in bash, which isn't even meant to be th