Re: [Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-05 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
I forgot to say my current package versions linux-image-2.6.30-2-generic 2.6.30-2.3 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.6.3-0ubuntu11 libdrm-intel1 2.4.5-0ubuntu4 libgl1-mesa-dri7.4-0ubuntu5 -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (

[Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-04 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-04 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:06:40PM -, Nattgew wrote: > I tested with the 965 with Jaunty UXA. The blur works fine, but is slow. > Setting the radius to 15 crashed Compiz for me (and then X froze). > After rebooting I ended up with a kernel panic. I'm pretty sure > that's related to the blur b

Re: [Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-04 Thread Nattgew
I tested with the 965 with Jaunty UXA. The blur works fine, but is slow. Setting the radius to 15 crashed Compiz for me (and then X froze). After rebooting I ended up with a kernel panic. I'm pretty sure that's related to the blur because that's not normal at all. -- [i965] compiz blur plugin v

Re: [Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-04 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
I've tested it with EXA and UXA with intel x4500hd. they effects (for instance scale) in both cases are slow, but the gaussian blur works. -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-03 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 11:13:20AM -, Nicol?? Chieffo wrote: > I think we should focus on UXA since exa is discontinued now Yes, but it's useful to know whether the issue is a regression in moving to UXA, or a pre-existing condition. -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug) https://b

Re: [Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-03 Thread Nicolò Chieffo
I think we should focus on UXA since exa is discontinued now -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
Do I understand correctly that currently the issue is that with UXA enabled, high levels of blur cause performance issues? What is the behavior with EXA enabled? -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 201264] Re: [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed: - [i965] compiz blur plugin not working + [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug) -- [i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U