Precise is Ubuntu 12.04, not 12.10, and reporting of crashes won't be
disabled for either of them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196172
Title:
Automatic bug reporting not so automati
But now it seems reporting of crashes is going to be disabled in 12.10
Precise?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196172
Title:
Automatic bug reporting not so automatic
To manage notifi
Fred, if you have tried 12.04 you will notice that it does still prompt
you to report crashes, but it doesn't require you to sign in to
Launchpad. All you need to do is click a button -- exactly what you
suggested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Things gonna crash and users are not even presented with an option to report
the issue?
I am sure that is gonna make users satisfied... -rolleyes-
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196172
I don't think that reporting should be completely disabled.
Why is reports disabled in the final release?
Reporting issues is a good thing!
Presenting the user with a choice to report an issue, is a good thing.
I am just opposed to requiring the user to go through the inconvenience
of registering
It's fixed in Precise.
---
apport (2.0.1-0ubuntu5) precise-proposed; urgency=low
* etc/apport/crashdb.conf: Disable Launchpad crash/kernel reports for the
final release. Leave Apport running for whoopsie, though, so use the new
mechanism for selective problem types.
* Cherry-pick from
Evan, I assigned this to you because I think merely switching from
Launchpad to the crash database fixes the bug as originally reported,
not because any extra mode is required. (Notice that it describes the
visible choice as "Good".)
A completely silent mode may be useful, but I think that's separ
** Description changed:
+ Apport or whoopsie could use a setting for automatically sending a crash
+ to the database without any user interaction.
+
+
+ As there was some confusion around this particular point, users will not be
directed to report a Launchpad bug post-release unless they have a
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Evan Dandrea (ev)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196172
Title:
Automatic bug reporting not so automatic
To manage notifi
Sorry so late to the party...
I would also like to add to this that there should be a way to automate
reporting via the /etc/apport/crashdb.conf or perhaps the
/etc/default/apport file. This would make certain it is the more
technically inclined users "automating" and this would also speed up QA
i
I wrote the following as my "first impressions" whinge after actually
following through a report with apport [for an issue I wasn't "invested"
enough in to report manually], after starting the process and giving up
many times prior.
I'd hate to just discard the wall of text I've built, but the con
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
Automatic bug reporting not so automatic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Here's what I envision: A new rhythmbox is released and pushed out to
the masses. It incorporates a new feature called crazy jukebox where it
makes all your windows wobble to the music (please don't code this!).
The developer is so excited about this new capability that it is pushed
out the door
Yes, surely having users with accounts are good because it makes it more
serious, and makes so you can reply to the reporter, and he can provide
additional information, help out more, and say if it gets fixed or
something.
Then we get the reports sorted into two categories, "anonymous noobs",
"ser
I agree with reporter. However, the website registration does enforce
some discipline and allows bug reports by serious users and those
patient enough to go through the registration process.
It would be nice if the user was presented with 3 options: Quick Bug
Submission, Detailed Bug Submission
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => apport
--
Automatic bug reporting not so automatic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
Using Apport to report a bug should not require a launchpad account. It
should be optional.
When you click on the "Send bug report" it should send the bug report
straightaway and say;
* "Thank you for reporting a bug. We will look into it and hopefully fix it
soon. We really appreciate your help
Bug reporting should be as quickly, easy as possible.
Bug reporting should never be an inconvenience to the user!
It is great if the user provides valuable information.
But it should never require the user to do more than to press a button, unless
he wants to.
... in another operating system tha
18 matches
Mail list logo
