[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-05-20 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
This has been applied in Jammy via stable update process: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1959376 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-02-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.13.0-30.33 --- linux (5.13.0-30.33) impish; urgency=medium * impish/linux: 5.13.0-30.33 -proposed tracker (LP: #1960055) * systemd/248.3-1ubuntu8.2 ADT test failure with linux/5.13.0-29.32 (LP: #1960034) - Revert "block: avoid t

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-02-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.4.0-100.113 --- linux (5.4.0-100.113) focal; urgency=medium * focal/linux: 5.4.0-100.113 -proposed tracker (LP: #1959900) * CVE-2022-22942 - SAUCE: drm/vmwgfx: Fix stale file descriptors on failed usercopy * CVE-2022-0330 - d

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-02-02 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Tested the proposed focal kernel - looks good as well: $ uname -r 5.4.0-98-generic $ apt policy linux-image-5.4.0-98-generic linux-image-5.4.0-98-generic: Installed: 5.4.0-98.111 Candidate: 5.4.0-98.111 Version table: *** 5.4.0-98.111 500 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/canonical-kern

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-02-02 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Tried the proposed impish kernel - looks good: $ uname -r 5.13.0-29-generic $ apt policy linux-image-5.13.0-29-generic linux-image-5.13.0-29-generic: Installed: 5.13.0-29.32 Candidate: 5.13.0-29.32 Version table: *** 5.13.0-29.32 500 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/canonical-kernel-t

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-02-02 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux/5.4.0-98.111 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-focal' to 'verification-done-focal'. If the problem still exists, change t

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-31 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux/5.13.0-29.32 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-impish' to 'verification-done-impish'. If the problem still exists, change

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-26 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957753 Title: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming To manage notific

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-26 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => M

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-25 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957753 Title: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/l

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-25 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2022-January/127401.html ** Description changed: [Impact] There is an issue with hypervisor host side mlx5 driver operation on Bluefield devices in kernels <=5.16 From patch description: When using libvirt to passthrough VF to VM it will

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-25 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Description changed: [Impact] - There is an issue with hypervisor host side mlx5 driver operation on Bluefield devices in kernels <=5.16 + There is an issue with hypervisor host side mlx5 driver operation on + Bluefield devices in kernels <=5.16 - Copied from patch description: + From pat

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Description changed: - [Impact] + [Impact] There is an issue with hypervisor host side mlx5 driver operation on Bluefield devices in kernels <=5.16 Copied from patch description: When using libvirt to passthrough VF to VM it will always set the VF vlan to 0 even if user didn’t requ

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Description changed: - There is an issue with hypervisor host side mlx5 driver operation on - Bluefield devices in kernels <=5.16 that was recently fixed in master - with a one-liner: + [Impact] + There is an issue with hypervisor host side mlx5 driver operation on Bluefield devices in kernel

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
Awesome! I will send the SRU request out, thanks for testing! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957753 Title: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
And, finally, the Jammy kernel: $ uname -r 5.15.0-17-generic $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 0 ; echo $? 0 $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 1 ; echo $? RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted 2 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Cha

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Impish kernel looks good: $ uname -r 5.13.0-28-generic $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 1 ; echo $? RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted 2 $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 0 ; echo $? 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Hirsute kernel looks good as well: $ uname -r 5.11.0-50-generic $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 1 ; echo $? RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted 2 $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 0 ; echo $? 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Focal: $ uname -r 5.4.0-97-generic $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 1 RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted $ sudo ip link set enp130s0f0 vf 2 vlan 0 ; echo $? 0 Looks good - vlan 0 programming doesn't result in EPERM as expected contrary to non-zero vlans. Will try others as well.

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-24 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
Note that it seems the current SRU cycle is the last one for Hirsute, so it's very likely that it won't get this fix. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-20 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
Hello Dmitrii, can you give these test kernel a try to see if they are working as expected? F: https://people.canonical.com/~phlin/kernel/lp-1957753-mlx5e/F/ H: https://people.canonical.com/~phlin/kernel/lp-1957753-mlx5e/H/ I: https://people.canonical.com/~phlin/kernel/lp-1957753-mlx5e/I/ J: https:

[Bug 1957753] Re: net/mlx5e: EPERM on vlan 0 programming

2022-01-20 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Impish)