(Not sure whose responsibility this is. I did not find the problematic
packaging code directly. Also filed as #1818987 under chromium-browser.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194574
Tit
Right now I have the former installed, also boom.
```
$ dpkg -L chromium-browser | grep changelog.Debian
/usr/share/doc/chromium-browser/changelog.Debian.gz
$ dpkg -l | grep chromium-
ii chromium-browser 72.0.3626.119-0ubuntu0.18.04.1
amd64Chromiu
$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/chromium-browser/changelog.Debian.gz
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 45 2011-03-02 07:28
/usr/share/doc/chromium-browser/changelog.Debian.gz ->
../chromium-codecs-ffmpeg/changelog.Debian.gz
$ ls -L /usr/share/doc/chromium-browser/changelog.Debian.gz
ls: cannot access /usr/share/doc/
Right. I don't think that we should sacrifice CD space just for this
rather academic case, and even if it happens it does not actually break
people's machines. In the worst case it can cause some documentation to
be missing.
** Changed in: cdbs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
c
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2008 10:06 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> (I fixed the description to correct the directions)
thanks.
>
> Indeed this can happen. We don't support partial upgrades, so it's not
> such a big deal (thus the bug priority), but it's a pathological case.
> Question is whether we wan
(I fixed the description to correct the directions)
Indeed this can happen. We don't support partial upgrades, so it's not
such a big deal (thus the bug priority), but it's a pathological case.
Question is whether we want to sacrifice a lot of disk space just to
support partial upgrades without lo
** Changed in: cdbs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
Status: New => In Progress
--
can cause broken symlinks in /usr/share/doc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
