[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures - incompatibility dulwich/breezy - needs breezy 3.2.1

2022-02-02 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Looks like both breezy-debian and lintian-brush has been resolved recently with new versions built successfully in Jammy. Not quite sure what fixed it, and I have seen a couple of (possibly related?) bug reports for this package set not too long ago. Anyways, seems fixed now, so closing the last op

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures - incompatibility dulwich/breezy - needs breezy 3.2.1

2021-12-07 Thread Bryce Harrington
With breezy fixed, a couple of these are now resolved: plusone-jammy+22.04:~$ rmad silver-platter silver-platter | 0.4.1-2 | impish/universe silver-platter | 0.4.3-1 | jammy/universe silver-platter | 0.4.3-1 | unstable plusone-jammy+22.04:~$ rmad dulwich dulwich | 0.20.15-1ubuntu1 | i

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures - incompatibility dulwich/breezy - needs breezy 3.2.1

2021-08-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
silver-platter affected as well: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/550921033/buildlog_ubuntu-impish- amd64.silver-platter_0.4.3-1_BUILDING.txt.gz (ctime, mtime, dev, ino, mode, uid, gid, size, sha, ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 10) ** Also affects: silver-platter (U

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures

2021-07-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
So it is an incompatibility of ii python3-dulwich 0.20.23-1ubuntu1 amd64Python Git library - Python3 module ii python3-breezy 3.2.0-1 amd64distributed version control system - Python 3 library That would be resolved by: breezy | 3.2.1-1 | impish-proposed/univers

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures

2021-07-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
The fail is on: File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/breezy/git/tree.py", line 1324, in _recurse_index_entries (ctime, mtime, dev, ino, mode, uid, gid, size, sha, ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 10) And indeed if we check the data there is has 11 elements, here with names:

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures

2021-07-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
It is already clear that eventually once all FTBFS are resolved all these need to be tested combined from proposed. So please combine "dulwich, silver-platter, breezy-debian, breezy, lintian-brush" as triggers together for all the tests of them. -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures

2021-07-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI - As of today both build issues are still locally reproducible in sbuild. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933034 Title: FTBFS in impish due to test failures To manage notificatio

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures

2021-07-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
The build of breeze itself is now showing a different issue (maybe just hiding this one) tracked in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breezy-debian/+bug/1937173 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures

2021-07-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
This change seems "infectionous" as now dependent packages break like lintian-brush in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/548012775/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-amd64.lintian-brush_0.107_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Also affects: lintian-brush (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received thi

[Bug 1933034] Re: FTBFS in impish due to test failures

2021-06-23 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Tags added: update-excuses ** Tags removed: update-excuses ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933034 Title: FTBFS in impish due to test failures To mana