[Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-09-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package wesnoth-1.14 - 1:1.14.17-2 --- wesnoth-1.14 (1:1.14.17-2) unstable; urgency=low * Install appstream metainfo file (LP: #1926104) -- Rhonda D'Vine Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:19:46 +0200 ** Changed in: wesnoth-1.14 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix

[Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-08-26 Thread Rhonda D'Vine
There is no appstream metainfo file installed (so far, I noticed that upstream ships one so I'll install it in the future). Finding that out was quite a huge digging around, it's not well documented or visible. The package though is in Debian main/Ubuntu Universe, and thus implicitly is clearly fr

[Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
How does the `project_license` tag in Wesnoths AppStream MetaInfo file look like? Because that's the thing that is looked at to determine whether the license is free. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-08-26 Thread Rhonda D'Vine
I have no clue how that is chosen. Where does that come from, is there something within the package to do, because I wouldn't know how the software center decides that. I rather thinkt his might be something within software center to explain why it thinks so, for now I have no clue how to adjust t

[Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-05-14 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Thanks for taking your time to report this issue and making Ubuntu better. I can confirm that wesnoth-1.14 is wrongly listed with proprietary license in Ubuntu Software on Ubuntu 21.04. I remember seeing reports for other open source packages also listed with wrong license, but I don't know if the