[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

Thanks a lot to you Stephan! -- [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubu

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

This bug was fixed in the package gnucash - 2.2.3-1ubuntu3 --- gnucash (2.2.3-1ubuntu3) hardy; urgency=low * Re-Enabling OFX Support (LP: #192031) + For this I used the changes from debians gnucash 2.2.3-2 version, without merging the new revision. + From Thomas Bushne

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

Ok, I don't merge the 2.2.3-2 version from debian, instead I'm adding the changes from Thomas (Debian Maintainer) to -1ubuntu2 (which will become now -1ubuntu3). Why? Because there are more changes then only my FTBFS fix. And reintroducing ofx support we can do directly. For the record, for the

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

I'll take a look, \sh -- [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

Last changes on the ubuntu changelog speaks about a direct modification of the source from Stephan Hermann : src/engine/SplitP.h: removed G_INLINE_FUNC to fix FTBFS Since I'm not completely sure that I would merge the debian version correctly, I subscribed Stephan Hermann. Stephan : I hope you d

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

** Changed in: gnucash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

I think merging will be better, since it reduces the delta with Debian. The existing Ubuntu changes shouldn't be too difficult to apply to -2. -- [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

Just because there was some minor changes in the ubuntu version since that time, but yes, it's also possible. My debdiff reproduce exactly the same changes than the debian package so I thought that it would be easier to do it like that. -- [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

Why not merge Debian version 2.2.3-2, which comes with ofx re-enabled? -- [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

Subscribing ubuntu-universe-sponsors to get it sponsored. -- [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists

[Bug 192031] Re: [hardy] Please re-enable OFX support

** Attachment added: "Debdiff to enable OFX support" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11970755/gnucash-ofx.debdiff ** Changed in: gnucash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: gnucash (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Saïvann Carignan (saivann) -- [hardy] Please re