[Bug 1916954] Re: autopkgtest regression on s390x and arm64

2021-03-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package puma - 4.3.6-1ubuntu4 --- puma (4.3.6-1ubuntu4) hirsute; urgency=medium * Another attempt to fix autopkgtest regressions (LP: #1916954, #1906307) - d/p/skip-test-hanging-on-s390x.patch: renamed to skip-test-hanging-on-different-arches.patc

[Bug 1916954] Re: autopkgtest regression on s390x and arm64

2021-02-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hmm, since you have tested this before I wonder, but here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puma/4.3.6-1ubuntu3 https://launchpadlibrarian.net/525169018/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-s390x.puma_4.3.6-1ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz This is an FTBFS on s390x now. Please debug and resolve! -- You received t

[Bug 1916954] Re: autopkgtest regression on s390x and arm64

2021-02-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
You had a whitespace issue in the changelog, but other than that all seem reasonable. Thanks for starting the discussion with Debian as all our delta seems to be autopkgtest related maybe we can sort it out. Sponsored and later needs to be ran against the other new bits to then hopefully work.

[Bug 1916954] Re: autopkgtest regression on s390x and arm64

2021-02-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I tested the attached debdiff in Canonistack VMs (s390x and arm64) and I got no autopkgtest failure. ** Attachment added: "debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puma/+bug/1916954/+attachment/5467252/+files/debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of