[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-27 Thread Chloé Smith
Thank you very much paelzer! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889248 Title: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Copy done ./copy-package --version 6.9.4-1 --from-suite focal --to-suite focal-updates --include-binaries --auto-approve --force-same-destination libonig Copy candidates: libonig 6.9.4-1 in focal libonig-dev 6.9.4-1 in focal amd64 libonig-dev 6.9.4-1 in focal arm64

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
After coordinating with Steve, this can be done in a better way. Rejected from focal-unapproved, now no-build pocket-copied to focal-updates (waiting for publishing). Once there I can promote it and that is it. And yes, this time we documented it :-) -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
It is no-change, but you never know. Yet a local test build of libonig_6.9.4-1ubuntu0.1 worked and now is uploaded to focal-unapproved. Once that is in -proposed and good there we can promote it and then bug 2084486 is finally unblocked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: jq (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: jq (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Ubun

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
As in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/retry/1.0.5-3build1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 we need a no-change rebuild to avoid the immutability to be an issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188924

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thereby this is ready for promotion in focal to unblock the SRU in bug 2084486. In this case just as in the other releases no excludes are needed because the -dev packages have rather safe dependencies not pulling in the world. rmadison -u ubuntu -s focal,focal-updates,focal-security jq libonig5

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
This found no objection in the MIR meeting, so we can go on promoting this once the dependency has been put in place @utkarsh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889248 Title: [MIR] mdevc

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-26 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Since the jq and libonig focal packages contain mostly the same major versions as the packages which are in main in jammy, and the detailed information in comment #15, ACK from the security team on promoting them to main in focal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-26 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello, this new request - to MIR jq+libonig to Focal - is for backporting one of the guest agent packages for one of our cloud partners back to Focal. It has a dependency on jq and to avoid component-mismatch, we'd like to MIR jq+libonig back to Focal. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Utkarsh asked me to re-evaluate this with my MIR hat in regard to the posibility to promote jq (and the libonig dependency) in focal as well. Ownership: #1 Those are owned by the server team and not representing a storm of activity as they are good citizen packages usually just working. So I'd be

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2024-11-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Also affects: libonig (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: jq (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: mdevctl (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: libonig (Ubuntu Focal) **

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2021-09-01 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI - mdevctl switched to rust, which to some extend makes everything a lot harder. There are plenty of things around the rust ecosystem that need to be sorted out first. As that is a whole new discussion it is tracked in a new bug 1942394 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2021-02-05 Thread Andy Whitcroft
All promoted as indicated in component missmatches: $ change-override -c main -s hirsute -S mdevctl Override component to main mdevctl 0.78-1 in hirsute: universe/misc -> main mdevctl 0.78-1 in hirsute amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main mdevctl 0.78-1 in hirsute arm64: universe/admin/opti

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2021-02-05 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Libvirt 7.0 in Hirsute is now pulling it in, setting to Fix Comitted ** Changed in: jq (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: mdevctl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed --

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2021-02-05 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: jq (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw) ** Changed in: mdevctl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw) ** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Whitcroft (apw) -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2021-01-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Great, thank you all who was involved! That completes the prep-processing for mdevctl. I have planned a merge of libvirt anyway - I'll pull mdevctl to main from there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2021-01-04 Thread Steve Beattie
I reviewed jq 1.6-2.1 as checked into hirsute. This shouldn't be considered a full audit but rather a quick gauge of maintainability. jq is a flexible command-line JSON processor. It ends up implementing its own language for querying and manipulating JSON structures. As such, there are times wher

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2021-01-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/usd-importer/+git/usd-importer/+merge/395767 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889248 Title: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Copyright improved in https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mdevctl/-/commit/80d9705bfb95c0a1824ab6409761e369ba62d256 It will be part of the next upload, but on it's own that isn't worth a new upload (nor a sync into the final freeze of groovy). Furthermore debian/* copyright is only me and thereby sho

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thank you Doko, fixing that ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889248 Title: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-10-16 Thread Matthias Klose
mdevctl looks ok, however it's missing copyright information for debian/* ** Changed in: mdevctl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: mdevctl (Ubuntu) Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-10-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
@Doko - any ETA on the MIR review part of mdevctl itself? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889248 Title: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-09-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thanks Eduardo, marking as "ready" by setting to "In Progress". Once the other tasks reach that state we can start to pull it in. ** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-08-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
-- For LIBONIG -- [Summary] Other than the dark shadow of "sigh another regex lib" no issue seems to be present in the packaging. MIR Team Ack. A security review is needed as there is CVE history. It seems to be already monitored and fixed for the use cases around PHP so this might be a quick one

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-08-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
-- For JQ -- [Summary] MIR Team ack, but a security team review is required. Recommended but optional: - adding a autopkgtest would be useful to detect issues early on [Duplication] There is no other package in main providing the same functionality yet. [Dependencies] OK: - no other Dependencie

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-08-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Description changed: - Note: - This is a preparation MIR only - Right now we will keep it as a suggest and in universe. - - The reason isn't mdevctl (which is fine) but that we'd also need - `src:jq` and for that `src:libonig` whcih currently (at least the server team) - does not want to own (

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-08-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: mdevctl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889248 Title: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig To manage notifications

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-08-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) ** Changed in: jq (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-08-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Ok, after discussing with the Team we think JQ on its own is worth for main an mdevctl as well. So let us open these up for review ... ** Changed in: jq (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: mdevctl (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-07-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Description changed: Note: This is a preparation MIR only Right now we will keep it as a suggest and in universe. The reason isn't mdevctl (which is fine) but that we'd also need `src:jq` and for that `src:libonig` whcih currently (at least the server team) does not want to own (

[Bug 1889248] Re: [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig

2020-07-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Summary changed: - [MIR] mdevctl + [MIR] mdevctl, jq, libonig ** Also affects: jq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libonig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libonig (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in