The default network is set to be autostarted but the start fails. The
libvirt-bin package tries to install a NAT network, is it desirable
considering the fact that many users will use a physical shared device
in a bridged configuration and will have to deconfigure this default
network?
The default
libvirt now creates a new bridge if virbr0 is already taken.
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
libvirt fails work if virbr0 exists when it is started
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Target: hardy-alpha-4 => hardy-alpha-5
--
libvirt fails work if virbr0 exists when it is started
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubun
This is the relevant error.
* Starting libvirt management daemon libvirtd
libvir: QEMU error : cannot create bridge 'virbr0' : File exists
Failed to autostart network 'default': cannot create bridge 'virbr0' : File
exists [fail]
--
libvirt fails work if vir
There are two possible workarounds/fixes:
a) Ignore failure of creating the new bridge, and just use the existing one.
b) Change the default bridge device from virbr0 to virbr%d. This will make
libvirt try virbr0, virbr1, etc. until it finds a free one.
a) is useful if libvirt died for some reas
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Soren Hansen (shawarma)
Status: New => Confirmed
Target: None => hardy-alpha-4
--
libvirt fails work if virbr0 exists when it is started
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185598
You recei
