[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815808
T
Great! Thank you!
Be warned that Dell might blow you off. Last I looked, they do not
officially support Linux on the XP 15. However they do support Linux on
some other systems that use the TB-10, including the very popular XP 13. I
would *guess* those systems will reproduce the same problem.
The TB16's ASMedia xHC (USB controller) dies:
[89535.271614] xhci_hcd :0a:00.0: xHCI host not responding to stop endpoint
command.
[89535.271945] xhci_hcd :0a:00.0: xHCI host controller not responding,
assume dead
I'll escalate this issue to Dell.
--
You received this bug notification
It's helpful to know that after I lost the USB devices in the kernel
exception, I moved the KVM to a builtin USB port.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 2:12 AM Gene Olson wrote:
> I got a good example of a v5.0-rc7 kernel exception attached. I can't
> reproduce them easily, although I could when I firs
I got a good example of a v5.0-rc7 kernel exception attached. I can't
reproduce them easily, although I could when I first filed my bug report.
Now it takes a few hours of full bore Ethernet traffic. This crash I once
again lost many/most of my usb devices.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:28 PM Gene
If you need anything else, please let me know ahead of time.
Thanks,
Gene
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:50 PM Kai-Heng Feng
wrote:
> Ok, please attach dmesg when this issue happens, preferably under
> v5.0-rc7.
>
> The dmesg in comment #1 didn't record useful information.
>
> --
> You received this
Ok, please attach dmesg when this issue happens, preferably under
v5.0-rc7.
The dmesg in comment #1 didn't record useful information.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815808
Title:
Th
It did fail on the first run after about 10 minutes. It did not fail again
after 60 minutes.
Gene
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019, 15:01 Kai-Heng Feng So seems like v5.0-rc7 doesn't have this issue?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.
So seems like v5.0-rc7 doesn't have this issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815808
Title:
Thunderbolt Ethernet high-traffic exception
To manage notifications about this bug go to
I ran the 5.0.0 kernel, sending data bidirectionally with iperf3. It
failed after about 10 minutes, I lost the Ethernet and the keyboard/mouse
connected through the TB-10 dock. Unfortunately I forgot to do an lsusb -v
in the crashed state.
After rebooting, I ran iperf3 again, bidirectionally fo
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer
to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
v5.0-rc7 kernel[0].
If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following
tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'.
If the mainline kernel does not fi
I tried what you suggested. Ethtool reported no changes in configuration
when I turned off receive offload. It reported substantial changes when I
turned off transmit offload. After turning off transmit offload, transmit
rate dropped from 930 Mb/s to abut 660 Mb/s, although I did not see a big
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815808
Title:
Thunderbolt Ethernet high-traffic exception
To manage notifications
This bug looks like similar to previous bugs such as bug 1729674, bug
1785780 and bug 1792574.
Gene, can you try running `sudo ethtool --offload rx
off` and see if you can reproduce the issue? If so, could you attach the
output from 'lsusb -v'? Perhaps we can build a kernel for you to test.
--
Thank you.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 6:15 PM Terry Rudd <1815...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Gene, upon further investigation, I made a mistake suggesting this bug
> is a duplicate of your earlier bug. We will investigate this bug stand-
> alone.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification becaus
Not a duplicate. The previous bug was a problem with the display which
first appeared in linux -44, which was duplicated and confirmed fixed in
-45. This is a new problem caused by excessive Ethernet traffic. This is
a different problem that existed in -43 and still remains in -45. It
should no
Gene, upon further investigation, I made a mistake suggesting this bug
is a duplicate of your earlier bug. We will investigate this bug stand-
alone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815
Gene, this bug appears to be a duplicate of one you filed on 1/30/2019.
I will duplicate this one over to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1813999
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
18 matches
Mail list logo
