[Bug 176622] Re: Logjam 4.5.3-2 never made it to the gutsy repository

2007-12-15 Thread Michael R. Head
(just took that GPL statement out of the description) -- Logjam 4.5.3-2 never made it to the gutsy repository https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 176622] Re: Logjam 4.5.3-2 never made it to the gutsy repository

2007-12-15 Thread Michael R. Head
whoops, you're most certainly right (about the GPL bit). I missed that the old source was still there. My bad. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: logjam After reporting bug #176621, I have found that it has already been fixed and was supposed to be in gutsy. Launchpad claims t

[Bug 176622] Re: Logjam 4.5.3-2 never made it to the gutsy repository

2007-12-15 Thread William Grant
It all built in Hardy. A lot of packages don't build on all architectures, generally due to a bug in the package. Before a couple of months back we didn't have a method to easily track which packages FTBFSed, but we do now. Things will hopefully be better for Hardy. ** Changed in: logjam (Ubuntu)

[Bug 176622] Re: Logjam 4.5.3-2 never made it to the gutsy repository

2007-12-15 Thread William Grant
Also, I don't see how it is a GPL violation. Nobody says you have to distribute binaries if you distribute source, and the old source is still available. -- Logjam 4.5.3-2 never made it to the gutsy repository https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176622 You received this bug notification because you a