[Bug 1761372] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2018-04-19 11:53 EDT--- > Sure, Thanks, Have created Bug 166958 for the same, soon it will get > mirrored to Canonical. Bug 166958 is now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1765364 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1761372] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From sathe...@in.ibm.com 2018-04-19 05:39 EDT--- (In reply to comment #20) > I got in contact with mdeslaur and he confirmed there is no bug yet for > spectre/meltdown on qemu for ppc64. > > I'd ask you to: > 1. file a new bug for that as this one here is about the -sxxm machine

[Bug 1761372] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From sathe...@in.ibm.com 2018-04-18 07:12 EDT--- This fix needs to be considered for other LTS streams aswell like xenial, Trusty. Can we use the same bz to track there inclusion aswell? Advice otherwise, Thanks in advance. Regards, -Satheesh -- You received this bug notific

[Bug 1761372] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From sathe...@in.ibm.com 2018-04-09 07:10 EDT--- (In reply to comment #13) > # qemu-system-ppc64 -M ? | egrep 'bionic|2.1[12]' > pseries-2.11 pSeries Logical Partition (PAPR compliant) > pseries-2.12 pSeries Logical Partition (PAPR compliant) > pseries-2.12-sxxm

Re: [Bug 1761372] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-06 Thread ChristianEhrhardt
> > > I wonder, what is the benefit of this then. > > If users need to change the machine type, then they can just as well set > the > > CFPC/SBBC/IBS caps right? > > I believe the issue is similar to what we initially hit with: > > Bug 165081 - LP1752026- Ubuntu18.04:POWER9:DD2.2: Unable to start

[Bug 1761372] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mdr...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-05 12:50 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) > So all that, to provide a -sxxm type that is NOT the default (not in your > patches, so I didn't make it the default in mine). > > I wonder, what is the benefit of this then. > If users need to change the