To all those involved. I am not in the position to test Ubuntu packages
as I don't run that myself and my computer doesn't support hardware
virtualization.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Artful)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You
This bug was fixed in the package cacti - 0.8.8h+ds1-8ubuntu0.1
---
cacti (0.8.8h+ds1-8ubuntu0.1) zesty; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/enable_faster_polling_than_cron.patch: split() is
deprecated in PHP 7, causing the code to fail. Closes: #860271,
LP: #1662027. Thanks to
Hello Joel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cacti into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cacti/0.8.8h+ds1-5ubuntu0.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
@Paul, because I didn't think of that at the time :) Sorry!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662027
Title:
cacti vs PHP 7 vs split
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
@Nish, why didn't you (fake-) synced cacti in Zesty, there were no other
delta's?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662027
Title:
cacti vs PHP 7 vs split
To manage notifications about
Hello Joel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cacti into zesty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cacti/0.8.8h+ds1-8ubuntu0.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
I'm uploading the fix for x, y and z now. We can sync in aa once it's
open.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * If the administrator configures cacti to poll data at a higher frequency
+ than the cron job that runs the poller, a fatal error is emitted.
+
+ * As the highest cron frequency
Once we are able to sync the package from Debian in AA, Ubuntu will have
the fix and we can SRU.
** Also affects: cacti (Ubuntu Aa-series)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Aa-series)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Aa-series)
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nish Arav
I will upload the same fix to Ubuntu tonight or tomorrow. Thanks Paul!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662027
Title:
cacti vs PHP 7 vs split
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: cacti (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662027
Title:
cacti vs PHP 7 vs split
To manage notifications about this bug go t
Bug is now fixed in Debian and unblocked for the upcoming Stretch
release.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #860271
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860271
** Also affects: cacti (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860271
Importance: Unknow
Sleeping on it another night makes sense. I understand what I was doing
wrong yesterday, I forgot to change the rrd file definition when
changing the poller interval.
Indeed, if someone wants to increase the frequency to something higher
than once per minute, cacti fails to support this currently
@Nish, if you want to fix this particular issue, I don't think you need
to fix the other uses of explode. I think you could also use explode
instead of split.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Hmm, I must also admit that I don't fully understand what this feature
is for (it doesn't seem to do what I expected).
Anybody that does now, can you explain why this should be fixed in older
releases?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
@Paul: I was asking mostly because the upstream changes don't
necessarily apply cleanly (the whole commit) because there seems to have
been a global move to microtime() in the source. Is that something I
should look at SRUing with this change? Or is it sufficient, in your
opinion, to just backport
Ouch, I forgot about this issue.
@Nish: It looks like that indeed. Are you asking the last questions for
a specific reason? It is the first time I see somebody ask me such a
question from the Ubuntu side.
I must admit that I underestimated the impact of this bug, please go
ahead.
--
You receive
@Paul,
I do see at least 6b5931130770cdfa5baa68c43a913dcabf1c3970 upstream that
fixes the split() calls in question. Is it suitable to just make those
changes in the versions in Ubuntu. Specifically:
--- cacti-0.8.8f+ds1.orig/poller.php
+++ cacti-0.8.8f+ds1/poller.php
@@ -451,11 +451,9 @@ while (
** Also affects: cacti (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cacti (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cacti (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because
Thanks for reporting this issue.
The code was introduced to fix issue
http://bugs.cacti.net/view.php?id=2446 in 0.8.8c.
Looks like already before that time Debian and Ubuntu replaced split()
by explode(), so that's why this one was missed.
Code is not present in the recently released upstream ve
21 matches
Mail list logo
