[Bug 165152] Re: kernel failed assertions

2009-01-28 Thread Michele Mangili
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report you can click on t

[Bug 165152] Re: kernel failed assertions

2008-08-29 Thread Leann Ogasawara
The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release. As a result, the kernel team would appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. There are one of two ways you should be able to test: 1) If you are comfortable

[Bug 165152] Re: kernel failed assertions

2008-04-16 Thread azzegai
This seems to be a bug in the e1000 kernel module, see http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=114368730330622&w=2 for more info. Looks like this bug was still present up to and including kernel version 2.6.16. Not sure if it has been fixed since, but I'm not getting these kernel warnings on another ser

[Bug 165152] Re: kernel failed assertions

2008-04-14 Thread azzegai
Hi Julius, Just to confirm that the above error occurs in the linux-image-2.6.15-51-server (uname: 2.6.15-51-server). ethtool output on the NIC is: driver: e1000 version: 7.0.33-k2 firmware-version: N/A bus-info: :05:01.0 -- kernel failed assertions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165152 Yo

[Bug 165152] Re: kernel failed assertions

2008-04-03 Thread Dave Love
JuliusBloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > thanks for your bugreport. > There is linux-image-2.6.15-23-server available for dapper. Does the > problem/error appear again with this kernel version? I don't know. I no longer work at the place where that system was running. -- kernel failed a

[Bug 165152] Re: kernel failed assertions

2008-03-29 Thread JuliusBloch
Hi, thanks for your bugreport. There is linux-image-2.6.15-23-server available for dapper. Does the problem/error appear again with this kernel version? Do you see any problems running linux-image-2.6.15-29-server? Or is there just the syslog entries? ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu)