[Bug 1646192] Re: AppArmor mangles the "name" for services protected by systemd

2017-06-05 Thread Henrik Holst
** Changed in: mariadb-10.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: mariadb-10.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646192 T

[Bug 1646192] Re: AppArmor mangles the "name" for services protected by systemd

2016-12-22 Thread Henrik Holst
Thanks, using the attached_disconnect flag in the ApparmorProfile for the second application worked! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646192 Title: AppArmor mangles the "name" for serv

[Bug 1646192] Re: AppArmor mangles the "name" for services protected by systemd

2016-11-30 Thread Seth Arnold
About the best that you can do to the mariadb profile is add the attach_disconnected profile flag: flags=(attach_disconnected) (add this between the profile name and the opening "{" character.) The error message from AppArmor indicates that the file/socket/etc isn't reachable in the 'current' na

[Bug 1646192] Re: AppArmor mangles the "name" for services protected by systemd

2016-11-30 Thread Simon Déziel
Hi Henrik, I believe this is a bug with the Apparmor profile as shipped by the MariaDB package. The systemd directives you references are using the mount namespace which mandates the usage of the attach_disconnected flag in the Apparmor profile. Moving the bug accordingly. ** Project changed: app