There shouldn't be a problem here. The purpose of saned is to share
scanners that are physically attached to the local system, so that
remote systems can use them. If the scanner is already accessible over
the network, a remote system can connect to it without using saned.
See also /usr/share/doc/
As I understand it, this is an upstream design choice. saned doesn't let
users select which scanners to share, it just shares any scanners that
it can see. I think if network scanners were shared, then 2 saned
instances on the same network get into a loop sharing the same
scanner(s) recursively.
N
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632183
Title
The attachment "Here is the patch I need to get saned to find all the
scanners" seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch"
flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a
member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message perfo
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
** Description changed:
When running scanimage -L on a remote system no scanner is found.
when running scanimage -L on local system (where saned is run) finds the
scanners.
when running scaned in debug mode I can see th
The problem still exists
I needed to patch saned.c:
I needed to change SANE_TRUE to SANE_FALSE
at line 1830:
reply.status =
sane_get_devices ((const SANE_Device ***) &reply.device_list,
SANE_FALSE);
** Attachment added: "Here is the patch I need
[Expired for sane-backends (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Description changed:
- When running scanimage -L on a remove system no scanner are found.
+ When running scanimage -L on a remote system no scanner is found.
when running scanimage -L on local system (where saned is run) finds the
scanners.
when running scaned in deubg mode I can see th
mike Bernson, thank you for reporting this and helping make Ubuntu
better.
To advise, the saned documentation has been rewritten. Hence, could you
please advise if it helps following
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SaneDaemonTutorial ?
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undeci
