Sorry. Biber is working as it must. My problem was that I hadn't removed
the locally installed biber binary (which was the workaround in 16.04)
after the dist-upgrade.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Hi Eduardo,
What versions are you trying to install?
In a fresh installation of yakkety, both of biber and texlive-extra can be
installed fine for me:
nikos@ubuntu:/> cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=16.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=yakkety
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 16.10"
nikos@ub
It might be fixed in the LTS 16.04, but it is still present in 16.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589644
Title:
[SRU] biber 2.4 to xenial
To manage notifications about this bug go
This bug was fixed in the package biber - 2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1
---
biber (2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Upload the SRU to xenial, because current 2.3 is uninstallable
with texlive-bibtex-extra (LP: #1589644)
-- Gianfranco Costamagna Mon, 13 Jun 2016
14:59:00
Also confirmed; thanks.
Package: texlive-bibtex-extra
Version: 2015.20160320-1
Package: biber
Version: 2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589644
Title:
[SRU] biber
Works for me, too. Same versions as above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589644
Title:
[SRU] biber 2.4 to xenial
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpa
Also confirming that this works for me. Thanks for getting a fix out!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589644
Title:
[SRU] biber 2.4 to xenial
To manage notifications about this bug g
Works for me.
Same versions as above :
Package: texlive-bibtex-extra
Version: 2015.20160320-1
Package: biber
Version: 2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1
Many thanks to everyone involved in solving this annoying bug !
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Installs and works!
~$ dpkg -s texlive-bibtex-extra biber | grep -e Package -e Version
Package: texlive-bibtex-extra
Version: 2015.20160320-1
Package: biber
Version: 2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
seems good so far
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589644
Title:
[SRU] biber 2.4 to xenial
To manage notificatio
Hello Nick, or anyone else affected,
Accepted biber into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biber/2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
** Changed in: biber (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: biber (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: biber (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Hi Locutus,
Thanks for sponsoring the upload.
No need to have one with my own signature, what you uploaded is fine :)
After this version is released, we should also close Bug 1565842
We can do it manually, or include it in the changelog, your call.
Regards,
Nick
--
You received this bug notifi
Hi, I did sponsor a "backport" with some changelog changes.
I did use 2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1 as version, because it is already higher than
xenial, and lower than yakkety.
Sorry for not using your ppa version, but the versioning was wrong, the
description of the issue empty, and so on :)
thanks a l
if you want you can go on irc freenode ubuntu-release chan, ask to reject the
current version in new queue
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
and provide a changelog entry with your signature :)
something like this:
biber (2.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=m
LocutusOfBorg: Version 2.5 is incompatible with TexLive in Ubuntu 16.04
LTS:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biber/+bug/1565842/comments/22
** Description changed:
Please SRU biber 2.4 to xenial.
[Impact]:
- Current biber version in xenial (2.3) is too
mmm why don't have 2.5 instead?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589644
Title:
[SRU] biber 2.4 to xenial
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt
** Description changed:
Please SRU biber 2.4 to xenial.
[Impact]:
- Current biber version in xenial (2.3) is too old for texlive-bibtex-extra
version (2015.20160320-1), as described in Bug 1565842 , making biber
practically unusable in xenial.
+ Current biber ve
@LocutusOfBorg:
Actually this incompatibility is what renders current (2.3) biber version
uninstallable in xenial, since it conflicts with current texlive-bibtex-extra
(2015.20160320) version. Bug 1565842 mentioned in the description contains all
the details about this.
@Alberto:
Thanks for the
Subscribing ubuntu-sponsors in order to request for a sponsorship of biber
2.4-1 into xenial-proposed .
This upload resolves Bug 1565842 which falls in the following SRU category,
because current (2.3) version of biber is uninstallable:
Bugs which represent severe regressions from the previous r
Since the bug is now nominated, I'm unsubscribing the Ubuntu Bug Control
team from this report.
** Changed in: biber (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: biber (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Nominated for xenial, but looking at the debdiff I'm a little bit scared (200k
LOC changed).
And I'm worried about:
+ * Incompatible biblatex/biber version is now a fatal error.
what does it mean? I don't want such regressions on stable releases.
** Also affects: biber (Ubuntu Xenial)
I
22 matches
Mail list logo
