** Changed in: charm-lxd
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573681
Title:
conflict when managing LXD storage with Juju 2.0
To manage notific
** Changed in: nova-lxd
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573681
Title:
conflict when managing LXD storage with Juju 2.0
To manage notifica
Fixes have landed for both nova-lxd and the lxd charm to support storage
pool configuration when the underlying LXD version supports it.
However, for a stock 16.04 install you won't get this feature by
default; we might want to consider switching to the active backport of
the latest LXD release to
** Changed in: juju
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573681
Title:
conflict when managing LXD storage with Juju 2.0
To manage notifications about
I thought with juju 2.1+ we no longer configure storage for LXD, which
means we would no longer conflict.
I suppose as we introduce support for more directly controlling storage
for lxd resources, we'll want to be using the new APIs and carving out
our own pools.
Can we confirm if 2.1+ still expe
Marking the LXD task fix released since that API landed about 6 weeks
ago.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573681
Title:
conflict when managing LXD storage with Juju 2.0
To manage no
LXD does support multiple storage pools as of LXD 2.9. Juju right now
will create a default pool and attach it to the default profile if one
isn't already detected.
OpenStack could simply define its own pool and attach it to its own
profiles, keeping both storage pools separate.
Do note that thi
Looping in LXD project for comment on support of multiple storage
backends as per comment # 4.
** Also affects: lxd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
