This bug was fixed in the package dpdk - 2.2.0-0ubuntu8
---
dpdk (2.2.0-0ubuntu8) xenial; urgency=medium
* d/p/ubuntu-backport-[36-37] fix virtio issues (LP: #1570195):
- don't let DPDK initialize virtio devices still in use by the kernel
- this avoids conflicts between kern
This bug was fixed in the package dpdk - 2.2.0-0ubuntu9
---
dpdk (2.2.0-0ubuntu9) yakkety; urgency=medium
* d/p/ubuntu-backport-[36-37] fix virtio issues (LP: #1570195):
- don't let DPDK initialize virtio devices still in use by the kernel
- this avoids conflicts between ker
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570466
Title:
Adding/removing ports leaks memory in dpdk
To manage notifications
FYI - Verified in Proposed.
Next I need to prep some Y tests to reasonably request an upload to
Yakkety to allow migration as Martin indicated.
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Christian, please upload the packge to yakkety too, otherwise this
cannot progress to xenial-updates.
** Also affects: dpdk (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
Xenial is released, so we are back in SRU mode.
Therefore I add the matching SRU Template for the upload of 2.2.0ubuntu8 which
is in the unapproved queue atm.
[Impact]
* without the fix removing guests that were connected to vhost_user ports
leaked memory. Thereby a longer running server wich
FYI - #1 is waiting for this discussion to complete and will backport the fix.
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openvswitch.org/msg60552.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570466
Titl
Discussion went on and we identified two different issues.
1. DPDK leaking on removal of used vhost_user ports
2. Openvswitch leaking on netdev_dpdk_vhost_destruct
I'll keep #1 handled in this bug and work with upstream on a fix to be
backported for our DPDK.
#2 got a but on its own => 1573091
-
** Summary changed:
- Adding removing/ports leaks memory
+ Adding removing/ports leaks memory in dpdk
** No longer affects: openvswitch-dpdk (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- Adding removing/ports leaks memory in dpdk
+ Adding/removing ports leaks memory in dpdk
--
You received this bug notifica
