Either the according package lists its successor(s) in the Depends field
(then it's usually called "transitional package") or there is no
(direct) successor at all. That can also happen.
Aptitude doesn't know more than the package (list) tells it.
Or do you have a different idea how Aptitude shou
** Summary changed:
- Missing sucessor for obsolite package
+ Missing sucessor for obsolete package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569168
Title:
Missing sucessor for obsolete packag
