Thanks for the quick turnaround!
Mark
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566764
Title:
LXD network setup question could be more explicit
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
This bug was fixed in the package lxd - 2.0.0~rc8-0ubuntu7
---
lxd (2.0.0~rc8-0ubuntu7) xenial; urgency=medium
* More lxdbr0 tweaks:
- Update wording of the initial question. (LP: #1566764)
- Refuse empty output for questions needing a value.
- Trigger lxd (through lxd-c
I can certainly agree with that, but the mandate for LXD until now has
been to not deal with network configuration itself, keeping this
separate, for example using neutron on nova-lxd.
The result is that the LXD upstream code as to how to create a bridge,
all it deals with is existing layer-2 inte
Very happy to have this but .. personally I think it is a bit jarring
(and ugly) to launch the debconf UI after being asked for ZFS config via
in-line questions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Screenshot of the suggested change: https://dl.stgraber.org/lxd-
setup.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566764
Title:
LXD network setup question could be more explicit
To manage n
Hi Mark,
Unfortunately debconf doesn't allow such long question strings...
What we can do however is change the question itself from:
"Do you want LXD to setup a network bridge for you?"
to:
"Would you like to setup a network bridge for LXD containers now?"
And the description text shown a
