Okay, I shall mark this bug as such.
Thanks!
** Changed in: twinkle (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
twinkle fails at missing shared library
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155249
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for U
steve,
after removing files in /usr/local/lib and reinstalling twinkle, it
found all libraries.
so my bug report was invalid.
-- juha
--
twinkle fails at missing shared library
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155249
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Steve Kowalik writes:
> Thanks for the information you provided. What worries me from the output
> is this line:
>
> libzrtpcpp-0.9.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libzrtpcpp-0.9.so.0 (0xb7642000)
>
> Which means you have your own local libzrtpcpp-0.9.so.0 installed -
> maybe that is the one that
Thanks for the information you provided. What worries me from the output
is this line:
libzrtpcpp-0.9.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libzrtpcpp-0.9.so.0 (0xb7642000)
Which means you have your own local libzrtpcpp-0.9.so.0 installed -
maybe that is the one that links against libccgnu2-1.5.so.0 and
libccrt
Michael Bienia writes:
> I can't reproduce this in a gutsy chroot on amd64. Here the twinkle
> binary is correctly linked against libccgnu2-1.5.3.so.0.
>
> Can you please run "which twinkle" and "ldd $(which twinkle)" and paste
> the output?
Michael,
Below is the info you asked. I install
I can't reproduce this in a gutsy chroot on amd64. Here the twinkle
binary is correctly linked against libccgnu2-1.5.3.so.0.
Can you please run "which twinkle" and "ldd $(which twinkle)" and paste
the output?
--
twinkle fails at missing shared library
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155249
You r
