[Bug 1547983] Re: Cache isn't always used

2016-03-06 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547983 Title: Cache isn't always used To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 1547983] Re: Cache isn't always used

2016-03-06 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apt-get download never used the cached packages at all. And now with apt(8) deleting the debs after a successful install, there won't be any in most cases anyway. It might make sense to do so, though. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 1547983] Re: Cache isn't always used

2016-02-22 Thread Sworddragon
> Do you mean the cache on disk (/var/cache/apt/archives)? On my example it was /var/cache/apt/archives/partial. > If so did you check that the package actually is there on your disk? Yes, it does partly exist after executing and aborting the first command. > I tried to reinstall vim-tiny whi

[Bug 1547983] Re: Cache isn't always used

2016-02-22 Thread Brian Murray
Do you mean the cache on disk (/var/cache/apt/archives)? If so did you check that the package actually is there on your disk? I tried to reinstall vim-tiny which was in my cache and saw the following: $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall vim-tiny [sudo] password for bdmurray: Reading package list