[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149524
Title:
mirrors s
Vish wrote:
> The original reporter has deactivated his lp account , is this still an issue
> for anyone else subscribed here?
> Has anyone contacted the owner about the two-way rsync mirroring?
>
>
Hi,
I'm not sure anymore what's the question about. I recall once answering
to some question t
The original reporter has deactivated his lp account , is this still an issue
for anyone else subscribed here?
Has anyone contacted the owner about the two-way rsync mirroring?
--
mirrors should update package files in the correct sequence
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149524
You received this
fi.archive.ubuntu.com is run by FUNET:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/mirrors-nic-funet-fi-archive
You'll have to ask the owner if they use two-way rsync mirroring.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
mirrors should update package files in the correct sequence
h
According to http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/mirror/3 and
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-mirrors-
announce/2006-August/02.html it has been policy that Ubuntu mirrors
must do the two-stage mirrorring that avoids this problem since a year
*before* this bug was filed.
Perhaps either:
*
This is probably something that the ubuntu-mirrors-admins group should
look at.
If this is wrong, I would appreciate input from them directing to the
correct group.
Setting as triaged, waiting on action from U-M-A.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
mirrors should upd
