Fixed Released, bug #149993 is about the new upload.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
waste of disk space
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact f
It was this one:
ubuntu-docs (7.10.1) gutsy; urgency=low
* Adding translations to source package
* Don't install libs/pdf directory
* Restore symlink-dupes script to eliminate duplicate files (LP: 149040)
* Fix debian/rules to take account of new location for pot files (thanks to
Martin
Daniel - thanks for this. Did you get the absolutely latest version? I
thought I'd updated the changelog to include info on the 90% change, but
I don't see that on the version in the gutsy-changes list.
--
waste of disk space
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149040
You received this bug notificati
Uploading.
--
waste of disk space
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bug
Following a discussion in #ubuntu-devel, I've made a further change in
the repository that only installs translations which are over 90%
complete; in order to slim down the package size to a manageable 1.3MB.
I understand this to be a temporary measure which we can then revert
when more space is av
Ok, I've committed a fix for this to the docteam repository - I've
restored the script that pitti added for feisty to eliminate symlinks.
Hope that does the trick.
Subscribing ubuntu-main-sponsors: I'd appreciate it if someone could
sponsor the package upload for me.
The source is here:
svn expo
On 04/10/2007, Jordan Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm, I've just been removing libs/pdf from the source package for
> edubuntu-docs. Is there any good reason to include that directory?
Nope. I've added this to debian/README.Debian in ubuntu-docs so that
it is automatically removed at build
hmm, I've just been removing libs/pdf from the source package for
edubuntu-docs. Is there any good reason to include that directory?
--
waste of disk space
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact f
On 04/10/2007, Jordan Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Matthias's point is that we are copying the same stuff to
> multiple locations when perhaps we should be using symlinks. Is that
> right?
That's partly right, but the bit I was talking about came from an
email exchange with Matthias
I think Matthias's point is that we are copying the same stuff to
multiple locations when perhaps we should be using symlinks. Is that
right?
--
waste of disk space
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
RC is no problem. We need some of these files, but not others (for
example the libs/pdf directory is not needed)
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew East (mdke)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
waste of disk space
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
11 matches
Mail list logo
