[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

1.10.0 is now available upstream and will reach Debian experimental shortly. Packaging is in Debian git as usual. I fixed the two issues that Tyler reported in upstream dbus, and applied Iain's /run/dbus fix in the Debian packaging. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

This bug was fixed in the package dbus - 1.9.20-1ubuntu2 --- dbus (1.9.20-1ubuntu2) wily; urgency=medium * debian/dbus.postinst: Check if /run/dbus exists before writing to a file there. If it doesn't then the system bus isn't running so we don't have anything to restart any

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

> However, even after pulling in that file from the git tree, `make check` is still failing on the test-bus.sh test. I think this might actually be a bug in libcap-ng older than 0.7.7: . Workaround and more analysis available on

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

Uploaded, btw. ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477086 Title: DBus 1.10 To manage notifications about this bug go

Re: [Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:05:10PM -, Simon McVittie wrote: > As far as I'm concerned, ship it! (Subject to whatever QA is needed > within Ubuntu.) I'm glad the delta has got smaller. > > If you badly need 1.10.0 tomorrow, that can happen. It will likely be > functionally identical to 1.9.20,

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

I forgot to mention that I manually tested the GetConnectionAppArmorSecurityContext and GetConnectionCredentials bus methods. Both work as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147708

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

Test log from the failed test-bus test. ** Attachment added: "test-suite.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1477086/+attachment/4447836/+files/test-suite.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

>From the AppArmor perspective, the 1.9.20 debdiff gets the green light. I installed the packages from your ppa and then was able to successfully run the dbus_*.sh tests in the AppArmor regression test suite (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~apparmor- dev/apparmor/master/files/head:/tests/regression/ap

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

As far as I'm concerned, ship it! (Subject to whatever QA is needed within Ubuntu.) I'm glad the delta has got smaller. If you badly need 1.10.0 tomorrow, that can happen. It will likely be functionally identical to 1.9.20, so that should be an easy freeze exception in any case. Regarding your ch

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

Done, test packages in ppa:laney/experimental. I was able to drop most of our delta - the remaining few things are attached. aa-get-connection- apparmor-security-context.patch should be able to go too once all users are ported off it. Let me know if you see anything wrong. I'd like to upload in a

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

Great. As far as I'm concerned, I can ship a 1.10 that is functionally identical to 1.9.20 any time; for now, I've been holding off on actually doing that to give the biggest user of D-Bus-with-AppArmor a chance to try it :-) I've been avoiding uploading to Debian unstable because the release team

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

Going to work on this tomorrow and over the next few days as a side task at Debconf, FWIW. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477086 Title: DBus 1.10 To manage notifications about this

Re: [Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:06:40PM -, Simon McVittie wrote: > I've released 1.9.20, which I'm treating as 1.10 rc1. 1.10 will > hopefully be identical to 1.9.20 except for versioning and NEWS. > > > - Move dbus-uuidgen unit file patch to using a tmpfiles.d snippet > > Done in Debian experimen

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

I've released 1.9.20, which I'm treating as 1.10 rc1. 1.10 will hopefully be identical to 1.9.20 except for versioning and NEWS. > - Move dbus-uuidgen unit file patch to using a tmpfiles.d snippet Done in Debian experimental (1.9.20-1). -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

> - Move dbus-uuidgen unit file patch to using a tmpfiles.d snippet ("L /var/lib/dbus/machine-id - - - - /etc/machine-id") as if we're booting systemd then we have /etc/mamchine-id I'll probably do that in the next dbus upload to Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

Re: [Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

On 2015-07-30 15:03:37, Iain Lane wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:51:17PM -, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > IMPORTANT: We can drop all but *one* AppArmor patch. aa-get-connection- > > apparmor-security-context.patch must stay until we've switched > > everything over to the new API that was taken up

Re: [Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:51:17PM -, Tyler Hicks wrote: > IMPORTANT: We can drop all but *one* AppArmor patch. aa-get-connection- > apparmor-security-context.patch must stay until we've switched > everything over to the new API that was taken upstream. Where is this work tracked? -- Iain La

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

IMPORTANT: We can drop all but *one* AppArmor patch. aa-get-connection- apparmor-security-context.patch must stay until we've switched everything over to the new API that was taken upstream. Also, it looks like another patch, unrelated patch, may be dropped. See bug 1479771. ** Description change

[Bug 1477086] Re: DBus 1.10

** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477086 Title: DBus 1.10 To m