[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-20 Thread Pali
Do you need something else to release new 0x version? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1462602 Title: Update 0x to stable version 0.6.1 To manage notifications about this bug g

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-15 Thread Seth Arnold
** Patch added: "debdiff to be applied against vivid package for utopic" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0x/+bug/1462602/+attachment/4415342/+files/0x_0.6.1-1%7E1ubuntu1.14.10.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-15 Thread Seth Arnold
** Patch added: "debdiff to be applied against vivid package for trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0x/+bug/1462602/+attachment/4415341/+files/0x_0.6.1-1%7E1ubuntu1.14.04.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-15 Thread Adam Conrad
** Also affects: 0x (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: 0x (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: 0x (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: 0x (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-15 Thread Pali
Ubuntu has already generated diff between 0.6-1 and 0.6.1-1 versions and it is on Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0x/0.6.1-1 Direct link to diff file is here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/193647295/0x_0.6-1_0.6.1-1.diff.gz Examining commits per changes for easy to read/re

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Pali, See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates: "7. New upstream microreleases In some cases, when upstream fixes bugs, they do a new microrelease instead of just sending patches. If all of the changes are appropriate for an SRU by the criteria above, then it is acceptable (and usuall

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-09 Thread Pali
I released version 0.6.1 (point release) as update to 0.6 which just fix security problems, crashes and update docs (to match program behavior). This minor 0.6.1 release is just drop-in update for 0.6 version and basically all changes between 0.6 and 0.6.1 should be applied. So for me it does not m

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-09 Thread Seth Arnold
Pali, ah, thanks for the explanation. What we normally look for in security updates is minimal patches that address just security updates. The usual way to prepare updates is to download the source packages for the different affected releases, adapt the patches to the specific software, and then p

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-09 Thread Pali
Seth Arnold, I'm upstream developer of 0x project, but I do not understand what you need. Do you need to create debian (source) package of new 0x version? It is already present in vidid, see: http://packages.ubuntu.com/vivid/0x https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0x -- You receiv

[Bug 1462602] Re: Update 0xffff to stable version 0.6.1

2015-06-08 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is availabl