[Bug 1407695] Re: [MIR] python-saml2, xmlsec1

2015-03-30 Thread Adam Conrad
Promoted python-pysaml2 and xmlsec1 to main. ** Changed in: python-pysaml2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: xmlsec1 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1407695] Re: [MIR] python-saml2, xmlsec1

2015-03-30 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks James and Michael, looks good to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407695 Title: [MIR] python-saml2, xmlsec1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1407695] Re: [MIR] python-saml2, xmlsec1

2015-03-30 Thread Michael Terry
OK, xmlsec1 and python-pysaml2 both are fine from a security and maintainability sense then. Approving both. ** Changed in: python-pysaml2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: xmlsec1 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: python-pysaml2 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1407695] Re: [MIR] python-saml2, xmlsec1

2015-03-30 Thread James Page
Michael I've uploaded a new version of xmlsec1 which detects any failures in the test suite exection and skips any tests that would fail in offline environments. I also had to limit some test execution to openssl only due to the way the xmlsec1 apps are built in Debian/Ubuntu (openssl only). **

[Bug 1407695] Re: [MIR] python-saml2, xmlsec1

2015-03-23 Thread Michael Terry
What's the story with xmlsec1's tests? I remember that failing tests don't stop the build on that one. ** Changed in: python-pysaml2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib