Unlike when this bug was originally submitted, the locales-all package
is now available in Ubuntu. I can think that locales-all is the
reasonable package for a case like the one in the bug description.
Maybe I'm missing something.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265126
Title:
Cons
** Package changed: langpack-locales (Ubuntu) => glibc (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265126
Title:
Consi
Any update on this? The code can be found on Github at the moment:
https://github.com/gentoo/locale-gen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265126
Title:
Consider parallel execution in lo
** Description changed:
In cases where one wants to produce a system image with a lot of locales
supported (e.g. supporting a number of collations for user selection in
various programs), it's easiest to generate a ton of locales. However,
locale generation is easily the slowest step of s
