** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about
I upgraded the server to 13.10 on 12/5/13.
Linux mizuno.stewart.local 3.8.0-30-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 22
20:52:24 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Will report if I see symptoms again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about
We wanted to see if this issue also exists in Saucy and/or the upstream
kernel before submitting an SRU to have that commit reverted. Are you
still unable to test Saucy or the upstream kernel?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Is the issue with commit 83cafc0 resolved in 13.10?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
I tried to install Saucy but the nvidia-310 failed against the Saucy
headers.
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia-310/310.44/build/nv-i2c.c: In function
‘nv_i2c_del_adapter’:
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia-310/310.44/build/nv-i2c.c:327:14: error: void value not
ignored as it ought to be
make[3]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/nvidi
Thanks for taking the time to test, Gregory. I think we may have
finally identified commit 83cafc0 as introducing the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page fail
That commit appears to still be in the latest mainline and Saucy kernel.
Can you test these kernels to see if the bug exists there as well? It
would be good to know if we need to revert this in just Raring, or if
something needs to be addressed upstream as well.
Saucy: https://launchpad.net/ubunt
83cafc0 uptime 7 days, 12:23, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
83cafc0 uptime 6 days, 21:32, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
That's great news, Gregory. We may want to let it run for a few more
days to confirm that is the commit that caused this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failu
83cafc0 uptime 5 days, 4:36, no issues
Successfully passed the five day mark!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notification
83cafc0 uptime 4 days, 42 min, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
83cafc0 uptime 2 days, 19:59, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
Up on 83cafc0:
Linux mizuno.stewart.local 3.8.0-30-generic #44~lp1208532Commit83cafc0Reverted
SMP Wed Aug 28 14:58:42 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Thanks Joseph. My next testing window will open on September 9, at which
time I will start testing these kernels one by one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page fai
I built three test kernels, each with a separate KVM change reverted.
The kernels are:
83cafc0 reverted: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1208532/83cafc0/
36bd9c8 reverted: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1208532/36bd9c8/
fd02c7a reverted: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp120853
Thanks again for testing, Gregory.
There are three additional KVM changes between 3.8.0-23 and 3.8.0-27:
83cafc03522cd7021d2ed00e84e9ca8e8f0bb716 KVM: x86: remove vcpu's CPL check in
host-invoked XCR set
36bd9c8f7573c1b5e754feeabc187b546aee6f48 KVM: VMX: fix halt emulation while
emulating inval
I didn't want to run apport-capture and flood the bug report with more
data, so I went ahead and rebooted to 3.8.0-23.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures
509834a uptime 5 days, 8:12
I have symptoms of the failure: the same Windows instance under KVM has
disconnected from the network. I tried logging onto Windows using the
VMM console window and the wait cursor is spinning. The dmesg log file
doesn't contain any traces of the put_page issue or any
509384a uptime 5 days, 39 min, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
509384a uptime 4 days, 20:08, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
509384a uptime 4 days, 5:13, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
Thanks for the continued testing. It would be good to know if we make
it past 5 days, which didn't happen with the 3.8.0-29.42 kernel. bug
1216444 also appears to be a duplicate, so we may have other folks that
can test this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
509384a uptime 3 days, 20:04, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
509384a uptime 2 days, 19:26, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
509384a uptime 1 day, 23:38, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
509384a uptime 23:01, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.
Up on 509834a:
Linux mizuno.stewart.local 3.8.0-28-generic #41~lp1208532Commit509384aReverted
SMP Tue Aug 13 15:06:06 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Yes, I will test 509834a.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
Thanks for the feedback, Gregory. Would it be possible for you to test
the kernel with commit 509384a reverted for a longer period of time? I
don't think you were able to reproduce the bug with that kernel, and
that may be the commit that introduced this bug.
The kernel can be downloaded from:
Bad news: after 5 days on 3.8.0-29.42, I hit the problem again.
greg@mizuno:~/Downloads/kernel-test/29.42$ uname --all
Linux mizuno.stewart.local 3.8.0-29-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 13 19:40:39
UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
greg@mizuno:~/Downloads/kernel-test/29.42$ uptime
12:54:27
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications abo
Thanks for testing, Gregory. So it sounds like this bug will be fixed
in 3.8.0-29.42. From you testing, it also sounds like commit 509384a
introduced the regression.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
3.8.0-29.42 uptime 3 days, 7:48, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
3.8.0-29.42 uptime 2 days, 12:05, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
3.8.0-29.42 uptime 1 day, 15.49, no issues
Do we expect this to be fixed in 3.8.0-29.42?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage no
3.8.0-29.42 uptime 1 day, 13:14, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
3.8.0-29.42 uptime 14:13, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Thanks for all the help testing, Gregory.I look forward to your
results with 3.8.0-29.42.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To mana
Testing raring-proposed, 3.8.0-29.42:
Linux mizuno.stewart.local 3.8.0-29-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 13
19:40:39 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Issue reproduced with 7326afa about 2 hrs ag. Current uptime is 1 day
5:36. Current dmesg attached.
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmeasg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1208532/+attachment/3774365/+files/CurrentDmeasg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because
7326afa uptime 21:45, no issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
Testing 7326afa:
greg@mizuno:~$ uname --all
Linux mizuno.stewart.local 3.8.0-28-generic #41~lp1208532Commit7326afaReverted
SMP Tue Aug 13 15:02:50 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Hi Gregory,
Yes, that would be great.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
Great to test 7326afa that is.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
509384a uptime 1 day, 1:31, no issues.
Joesph, would you prefer I move on to test 7326afa or 3.8.0-28.41?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-2
I also experienced this issue within 4 hours of a host upgrade to kernel
3.8.0-27 yesterday, and migrating ~16 guests in.
There were two observed guest types which lost networking: Ubuntu 12.10
Quantal, and Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid LTS. Rebooting guest was the only way
to re-establish bridged network c
509384a uptime 7:20, no issues
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Another helpful test would be to test the latest Raring kernel in
-proposed, which is 3.8.0-28.41. That can be done by enabling the
proposed repository: See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
for documentation how to enable and use -proposed.
Another option would be to download the 3
Testing 509384a:
greg@mizuno:~$ uname --all
Linux mizuno.stewart.local 3.8.0-28-generic #41~lp1208532Commit509384aReverted
SMP Tue Aug 13 15:06:06 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Will do!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linu
I have a couple of test kernels available at:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1208532/
There are two directories there, each contains a kernel with the
directory names commit reverted:
509384a
7326afa
Can you test each of these kernels, and post back if either resolves
this bug?
Thanks i
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go
Up 5 days, 0 min, with no issues. This is a regression between
3.8.0-23.34 and 3.8.0-27.40.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage
up 3 days, 14:18
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
up 2 days, 12:04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
Still solid on 3.8.0-23 after 1 day, 14:53 uptime. Looking like a
regression between -23 and -27.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To
After dropping back to 3.8.0-27, reinstalling nvidia-310 and repairing
Unity, the error happened again. One of the Windows VMs loses its
network connection. When I attempt to shut the VM down (from within
Windows Server 2012), it freezes during shutdown. I am then unable to
stop the VM, not even wi
I installed the 3.11 kernel dated 201308070514.
I had problems with:
- NVIDIA driver: was using nvidia-310, but "no suitable driver" for the newer
kernel
- Unity: wouldn't come up
- KVM: didn't come up (machine is mainly a host for VMs)
I dropped back to 3.8.0-27 and am trying to repair Unity so
** Tags added: kernel-unable-to-test-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208532
Title:
put_page failures with 3.8.0-27.40
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer
to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
v3.11 kernel[0].
If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following
tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'.
If the mainline kernel does not fix t
62 matches
Mail list logo
