On 28 June 2013 16:17, Iain Lane wrote:
> I'm guessing you got that from the changes file (or Launchpad's view of
> it)? Those aren't quite the same as Debian changelogs, although
> obviously they are parsed from them.
>
Yes, from Launchpad. I see. Ok.
--
You received this bug notification be
status invalid
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:20:07AM -, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in
> to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does
> not conform to changelog format as defined
Public bug reported:
The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in
to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does
not conform to changelog format as defined by debian-policy [2]:
glib2.0 (2.37.3-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low
* Resynchronise on
