[Bug 116757] Re: Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable

2008-02-16 Thread Richard Johnson
Moved issue to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Maintenance since the PG is now maintained on the wiki. Thank you! ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116757

[Bug 116757] Re: Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable

2008-02-16 Thread Richard Johnson
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low Assignee: Jordan Mantha (laserjock) => Richard Johnson (nixternal) -- Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116757 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 116757] Re: Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable

2007-05-25 Thread Martin Albisetti
Ming Hua is correct, that precisely is what I did. -- Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 116757] Re: Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable

2007-05-25 Thread Ming Hua
The guide assumed people will copy the debian/rules file from hello package, then it would be already executable (assuming they use "dpkg- source -x" to extract the package). If people write debian/rules by themselves, the current wording is probably not clear enough. -- Packaging Guide not clea

[Bug 116757] Re: Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable

2007-05-25 Thread Jordan Mantha
hmm, it really isn't clear is it? :/ Thanks for the report. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jordan Mantha Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- Packaging Guide not clear on "rules" having to be executable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116757 You received