Can an archive admin fakesync these from debian-multimedia? They should
be able to at least live in multiverse until the licensing is further
sorted out.
** Summary changed:
- [needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
+ Please sync liberation from debian-multimedia
--
Please sync lib
Kernel - your package has a problem: it does not automatically replace
Arial, Times, etc. in documents and Web pages. The debian-multimedia
package does.
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you ar
The fonts can be packaged now. The only question is which repository to
put them in. If in doubt, we can place them in multiverse, and there's
nothing to prevent moving them later.
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bu
good news: there is a new version of the liberation fonts that have
completed hinting, and look beautiful. not sure if everyone knows this,
but I've not seen any official announcement, so i thought i'd mention
it.
bad news: the license has not changed, so the concerns raised here still
remain.
se
add the lines below to you /etc/apt/sources.list
# Corenominal PPA
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/corenominal/ubuntu gutsy main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/corenominal/ubuntu gutsy main
On the terminal type:
$ wget http://crunchbang.org/misc/corenominal.key
$ gpg --import corenominal.key
$ gp
Debian-multimedia has a package too.
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/package/ttf-liberation.php
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Getting a NEW package into Ubuntu still requires the standard REVU
processes. Just because "debs" (and source packages) are available
elsewhere, this does not mean that they meet debian (or Ubuntu) policies.
The only locations that we can "sync" from are Debian or occasionally Debian
Multimedia
Linux Mint, Rubix, and I'm sure many other dpkg-based distros have ttf-
liberation packages already. No need to reinvent the wheel.
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
An updated version is waiting on REVU for reviews to review it. [1]
Another big problem is the licensing
[1] http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=ttf-liberation
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification b
There is also a package present on
http://www.rubixlinux.org/debian/ttf-liberation/.
Minor alterations need to be made for fontconfig replacements; I have done that
here:
** Attachment added: "Unofficial "mod" of rubixlinux package (2-1-unofficial0)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11026944/ttf
There is a package on debian-multimedia.org.
http://debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/libe/liberation-fonts/
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug co
Link: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=ttf-liberation
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Daniel,
I have uploaded a package, but can not change to In Progress.
You are not the bug assignee nor the maintainer of Ubuntu, and
therefore cannot edit this bug's status.
Thanks,
Mike
On Nov 23, 2007 12:56 AM, Daniel Holbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please mark as 'In Progress' again, if t
Please mark as 'In Progress' again, if there's a package to review which
can get uploaded.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Triaged
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are
I don't believe the GPL 3 was out when these fonts were released. RedHat
should look at how they license these fonts again. Is there any sort of
bug filed at the redHat site for this?
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this b
The license.txt is very long, but most of it is just legalese, like
"Software and each of its components, including the source code,
documentation, appearance, structure and organization are owned by Red
Hat", "To the maximum extent permitted under applicable law, the
Software is provided and licen
** Attachment added: "ttf-liberation_1.00-1_all.deb"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9519523/ttf-liberation_1.00-1_all.deb
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Pascal de Bruijn has provided a Feisty package which I tested succesfully under
Feisty (also attaching it here):
http://blog.pcode.nl/2007/05/11/redhats-gift/
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because
This would not pass REVU according to this:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/Reviewing#head-0b688d507e837332c6fdf2e3ef8c19093d8e0644
The REVU link is nuked.
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification becau
Even though debian has rejected them, that doesn't mean we should.
I would like to point out that we do package the Larabie fonts. Which
are nonfree altogether.
My point: We should package them either way. However, discussion is
appropriate to determine whether they end up in
main/universe/multiv
Indeed.
Liberation would make a good addition to Ubuntu. These fonts should make
it into Gutsy.
Also, Sans & Serif should be packaged. We should wait with Mono, because
it's crappy in it's current state. Mono has no hinting, and it's O and 0
are easily confused.
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu need
I took a look at these restrictions and they were quite carefully
crafted indeed. RedHat seemingly wanted to create a situation where they
can release something that passes as open source but that at the same
time would not be approved of many distributions - leaving the font
basically for themselv
It should be noted that Debian rejected these fonts, based on the
license (GPL + restrictions).
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg36597.html
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: Debian
Status: Unknown => Unconfirmed
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
There's a package waiting on REVU:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=5182
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #423503
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423503
** Also affects: Debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423503
Importance: Unknown
** Summary changed:
- Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
+ [needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
[needs-packaging] Ubuntu needs the Liberation Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113889
You received this bug notificati
27 matches
Mail list logo
