Override component to main
spice-html5 0.2.2-0ubuntu1 in focal: universe/misc -> main
spice-html5 0.2.2-0ubuntu1 in focal amd64: universe/web/extra/100% -> main
spice-html5 0.2.2-0ubuntu1 in focal arm64: universe/web/extra/100% -> main
spice-html5 0.2.2-0ubuntu1 in focal armhf: universe/web/extra/1
subscription added today for ubuntu-openstack (apologies missed before).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
[MIR] websockify, spice-html5
To manage notifications about thi
On promotion please recheck if the package subscription was done, ddstreet
pinged jamespage already.
Just to be sure before moving to main.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title
spice-html5 seems ready for promotion.
@AAs please could you promote this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
[MIR] websockify, spice-html5
To manage notifications about t
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
[MIR] websockify, spice-html5
To manage notifications abo
This bug was fixed in the package spice-html5 - 0.2.2-0ubuntu1
---
spice-html5 (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium
* New upstream release, completing Ubuntu MIR actions (LP: #1108935):
- d/p/fix-windows-spice-upside-down.patch: Drop, included in
upstream release.
-
Thank you jamespage.
Yes with:
spice-html5 | 0.2.2-0ubuntu1 | focal-proposed/universe | source
Everything requested is in place.
MIR Ack for spice-html5 (the rest was already ok)
I don't see it in mismatches yet, so I'm marking it "In Progress" for
now-
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubunt
In response to Christian's list of TODO's in his review
To ensure a base level (requirement for the ack)
- set someone down a day installing that fo real
- use it with Openstack
- (try to) use it without openstack as well
- is it really providing what you want/need?
TODO => State on the bug the re
Override component to main
websockify 0.8.0+dfsg1-10ubuntu2 in disco: universe/python -> main
python-websockify 0.8.0+dfsg1-10ubuntu2 in disco amd64:
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python-websockify 0.8.0+dfsg1-10ubuntu2 in disco arm64:
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python-websocki
[Duplication]
- no such function in main
[Embedded sources and static linking]
There is plenty of js code, but that is the actual program.
None of it seems to be an embedded copy, but as Seth already mentioned IMHO
javascript experts are rare within Ubuntu so be sure when you own the package
to
Based on #24 I think we need to push out the seeding of nova-spiceproxy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
[MIR] websockify, spice-html5
To manage notifications about thi
nova-spiceproxy has not yet been seeded so spice-html5 has not appeared
in component mismatches.
I'll need to talk to the release team about that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
@JamesPage - just to be sure, you tested and are ok with spice-html5
being sufficient for your needs in Openstack? I wonder as [1] still
calls it a prototype, there is a long list of major TODOs reworking the
functionality. OTOH [3] isn't too bad and [4] shows some renewed
activity. Maybe for 19.10
I was only checking changes to websockify after 2016-07-11 (last ack by mterry)
if they would make it a Nack again.
Ok, none of the changes has made it worse.
But back then python2 removal wasn't a mission yet, but important now.
I'm slightly concerned as e.g. the 'websockify' binary depends on p
James and I were talking on remaining blockers on Disco.
[07:43] there is more history to be read on that one for sure ...
[07:45] jamespage: this actually is ok already IMHO
[07:45] in comment #8 you got the MIR ACK
[07:46] in comment #11 and #12 you got the conditional security ack
[07:46] a
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
@vorlon quite correct - the upload contained the requested fix for the
security team review.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
[MIR] websockify, spice-html5
To manage not
This MIR was wrongly closed by an upload of the websockify package. As
far as I can see it still needs approval before promotion.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
This is fixed for nova in 2:19.0.0~b1~git2019013113.33aad0fe41-0ubuntu2.
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Titl
** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
This bug was fixed in the package websockify - 0.8.0+dfsg1-10ubuntu2
---
websockify (0.8.0+dfsg1-10ubuntu2) disco; urgency=medium
* Update for Ubuntu MIR based on Ubuntu Security team review
(LP: #1108935):
* d/p/error-websockify-c.patch: Add compiler errors to websockify
websockify updated with review comments from security team for disco.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu OpenStack (ubuntu-openstack) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Incomplete
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Tit
[Expired for spice-html5 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
Outstanding work on websockify to complete MIR process; assigning to
ubuntu-openstack for resolution
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Corey Bryant (corey.bryant)
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) => Ubuntu OpenStack
(ub
I reviewed spice-html5 version 0.1.7-1 as checked into Debian unstable.
This should not be considered a full security audit. It's even pretty
sparse by my usual standards.
spice-html5 is a unique package -- its contents mostly don't influence
the machine where it is installed. It's also a huge amo
I reviewed websockify version 0.8.0+dfsg1-7ubuntu1 as checked into artful.
This should not be considered a full security audit but rather a quick
gauge of maintainability.
Websockify has no CVEs in our database
- Websockify provides a daemon to turn arbitrary TCP sockets into
"websockets" suita
jamespage: hi - I'm not familiar enough with either project to have a
preference
jamespage: considering that spice is already in main, that might be the route
that results in the least amount of code going from universe to main
tyhicks tych0
--> powersj (~powe...@c-98-245-171-167.hsd1.co.comca
spice it is!
** Changed in: spice-html5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Description changed:
+ > websockify
+
Availability: Currently in universe
Rationale: Dependency for nova console access
Security: No security history.
Quality Assurance: Package works out of th
OK, my concerns from comments 1 and 4 are addressed. Tests seem fine
now.
Overall packaging is fine. Passing to security for a quick look and to
address comment 7.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned)
This will need pairing with either novnc or spice - checking with the
security team on preference.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Re-visiting this for 16.10.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => New
** Description changed:
Availability: Currently in universe
- Rationale: Dependency for nova
+
+ Rationale: Dependency for nova console access
+
Security: No security history.
+
Quality Assura
Michael
After some discussion with contributors to this project and within the
Ubuntu Server team, I'm withdrawing this MIR for now; I'm not happy that
enough QA goes on upstream prior to releases - the broken test suite is
just one symptom of this.
For now, we will skip the websockify dependent
Looks mostly fine. But there are tests that aren't being run.
Running "tox -c tests/tox.ini" showed some errors (looked to be test
bitrot problems). Can those be fixed up and run?
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because
Ressurecting for utopic; required for nova still.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
[MIR] websockify
To
[Expired for websockify (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Looks like the rebind script is a bit broken. It tries to point at
/usr/bin/rebind.so for the LD_PRELOAD.
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: websockify (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108935
Title:
[
40 matches
Mail list logo
