** Changed in: gnumeric
Importance: Unknown => High
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
goffice (0.4.0-1ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low
* Merge with debian experimental
- keep the gtk/gnome multibuild
- keep calling intltool-update -p
* Closes LP: #89879, LP: #109204, LP: #59529
goffice (0.4.0-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream development release.
* Upstream f
I know you made a working package. I use it and I thank you. But Ubuntu
is "linux for human beings" so most of the people don't read the forum
and haven't installed your package. Ubuntu should work out of the box
but, right now, gnumeric doesn't work on ppc.
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple cha
mambro.
see my post at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2717955#post2717955
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
How can you say that isn't a serious regression? Gnumeric means charts
for most of the people. If i can't make charts I can't use gnumeric.
It's more than serious!
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification bec
How can you say that isn't a serious regression? Gnumeric means charts
for most of the people. If i can't make charts I can't use gnumeric.
It's more that serious!
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification bec
This does not fit the SRU criteria at all, it's neither a really serious
regression nor data loss. Also, it needs to be fixed in gutsy first (the
bug task is still open for gutsy).
This would be an ideal candidate for a backport once it's fixed in
gutsy.
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts
Closing gnumeric task, problem is in goffice
** Changed in: gnumeric (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Someone can tell me why this fix is not yet avaiable?!?!
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
That's good news about this bug being fixed in the next release, but
can't Sam's fix be incorporated into the current libgoffice-0-3 for
those of us who don't want to update goffice and gnumeric to a version
that may be less stable in feisty? Update Manager keeps nagging me to
update libgoffice, an
They have realased goffice 0.4.0 and gnumeric 1.7.10 that solve the bug
http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnumeric/announcements/1.7/gnumeric-1.7.10.html
I know that ubuntu policy say not to change software version in the same
release but gnumeric 1.7.x are a development versions so it's normal
that
debian bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411628
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
You need some further tests? if you need I do something ask me.
I ask you this because i don't see the package in the official tree yet..
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
i have built a patched version on x86, and could see not regression in
graph drawing.
i.e. the patch fixes big endian, without breaking little endian
(i dont think this should be assigned to me any more, as i dont think
there is any more work i can do.)
** Changed in: goffice (Ubuntu)
Assig
** Changed in: gnumeric (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
The package works also for me
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts) on bigendian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
the upstream patch is at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=87150 it only touches 4
lines.
it applies cleanly to the ubuntu goffice 0.3.7-0ubuntu1 package. i have
built the package and tested it on powerpc
http://tygier.co.uk/pub/libgoffice-0-3_0.3.7-0ubuntu1_powerpc.deb
the patch solve
jean from gnumeric has tracked this down to the cairo_to_pixbuf()
function in goffice/utils/go-image.c
i'll try to make a patch for ubuntu
** Changed in: goffice (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnumeric => goffice
Assignee: (unassigned) => sam tygier
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts)
Why ubuntu has 1.7.x version that is a development branch and not 1.6.x
that is considered stable?
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: gnumeric (upstream)
Status: Unknown => Unconfirmed
--
Gnumeric strange colors (purple charts)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
i am also seeing this on a powerbook G4
** Changed in: gnumeric (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #432532
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432532
** Also affects: gnumeric (upstream) via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id
21 matches
Mail list logo
