On Sunday 02 November 2014 20.09.19 Grond wrote:
> Might also want to look into uploading 2.1.1 into the debian repository.
> (It's still at version 2.0-3.1)
What you mean? https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/medusa.html
The stable version is old because... well... stable is old ;)
/l
--
You rece
Might also want to look into uploading 2.1.1 into the debian repository.
(It's still at version 2.0-3.1)
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 11:10:40AM -, Luciano Bello wrote:
> I'm not a launchpad user, so let me know if I did something wrong in the
> workflow. I don't know why this report was not closed
I'm not a launchpad user, so let me know if I did something wrong in the
workflow. I don't know why this report was not closed after 2.1.1
upload. 2.1.1 is out there since long.
** Changed in: medusa (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
On Tuesday 31 December 2013 07:32:15 Grond wrote:
> I suggest to the developers that they package version 2.1.1 and put it
> in the repositories.
I'm really sorry about the current state of the medusa Debian package. I will
upload the new upstream version soon.
Promised.
/luciano
--
You recei
I have a fix for this bug.
medusa 2.0's support for NCP, Postgres, SSH, and SVN bruteforcing is broken.
The problem is with the original source and has nothing to do with ubuntu
packaging it.
These problems have been fixed upstream in version 2.1.1.
I suggest to the developers that they package
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: medusa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1083516
Title:
ssh
