[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2013-11-09 Thread Ben Howard
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/quantal-security/linux-backports- modules-3.5.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package hv-kvp-daemon-init - 0.3ubuntu4~12.10.0 --- hv-kvp-daemon-init (0.3ubuntu4~12.10.0) quantal; urgency=low * Backport to quantal to support new LBM hv_kvp_daemon (LP: #1089970) hv-kvp-daemon-init (0.3ubuntu4) raring; urgency=low * Add build-dep on

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-backports-modules-3.5.0 - 3.5.0-21.7 --- linux-backports-modules-3.5.0 (3.5.0-21.7) quantal-proposed; urgency=low [ Andy Whitcroft ] * The hv_kvp_daemon is flavour specific when built from within LBM so include the flavour to avoid coll

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-security/linux-backports- modules-3.2.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package hv-kvp-daemon-init - 0.3ubuntu4~12.04.0 --- hv-kvp-daemon-init (0.3ubuntu4~12.04.0) precise; urgency=low * Backport to precise to support new LBM hv_kvp_daemon (LP: #1089970) hv-kvp-daemon-init (0.3ubuntu4) raring; urgency=low * Add build-dep on

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-backports-modules-3.2.0 - 3.2.0-35.22 --- linux-backports-modules-3.2.0 (3.2.0-35.22) precise-proposed; urgency=low [ Andy Whitcroft ] * The hv_kvp_daemon is flavour specific when built from within LBM so include the flavour to avoid co

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Terry
Ah, thanks Adam. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hv-kvp

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Adam Conrad
Oh, I failed to mention I'd approved it along the way after fixing the upstart madness, Michael. Sorry about that. Just noticed the bug chatter when I came back to play. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Terry
Sure, hv-kvp-daemon-init is fine. Lintian warning still there, but as you say that is a false-positive from how upstart-job works. The upstart script now uses the exec directive, thanks! Ya'll apparently have a bzr branch for this package? I'd like to see that mentioned in a Vcs-Bzr line in deb

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Terry
Moving back to incomplete, since this hasn't actually been approved yet (though it seems to have gotten promoted?). Will re-review. I "got the idea" that the lintian warning was rare from Debian's lintian reports: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script.h

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Fixes for the kernel components as requested by @Adam are now building in our PPA and will be ready for copying out shortly. ** Changed in: linux-backports-modules-3.5.0 (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-backports-modules-3.5.0 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importanc

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package hv-kvp-daemon-init - 0.3ubuntu4 --- hv-kvp-daemon-init (0.3ubuntu4) raring; urgency=low * Add build-dep on python and use dh_python2 to detect python deps. -- Adam ConradMon, 17 Dec 2012 04:37:24 -0700 ** Changed in: hv-kvp-daemon-init (Ubuntu

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/raring-proposed/hv-kvp-daemon-init -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage notifications about this bug go to: ht

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Adam Conrad
Adding linux/LBM tasks to remove the daemon() call from the daemon, so it can actually be managed by upstart sanely. ** Also affects: linux-backports-modules-3.2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-backports-modules-3.5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-17 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-16 Thread Adam Conrad
Ok, so, the above diff doesn't work for a variety of reasons, but I have a more comprehensive diff here that does the right thing, but makes two (currently false) assumptions: 1) the lbm versions of the daemon are named after the flavour, rather than named $version_lbm (which conflicts between fl

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-14 Thread Adam Conrad
Proposed (untested) diff to actually use upstart exec correctly: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1440866/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage not

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-14 Thread Adam Conrad
I'm not sure where mterry gets the idea that this bogus lintian warning is unique: E: udev: postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script etc/init.d/udev-finish E: udev: postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script etc/init.d/udev It's just a by-product of the upstart-job symlink, yes,

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-12-14 Thread Michael Casadevall
I've cleaned all the lintian errors as of right now including the update-rc.d one and fixed the upstart behavior. I didn't catch the maintainer issue, but I'll get it fixed in bzr so it will be corrected on the next upload. I also need promotion in raring/quantal-proposed /precise-proposed -- You

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Terry
Simple enough packaging, but I have a few questions/comments. * You should run 'update-maintainer' in the source tree to set the Maintainer field to the standard value. * The upstart task manually calls exec & kill instead of using an exec stanza. Is there a reason for that? * There is a lintia

[Bug 1078106] Re: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Terry
** Package changed: ubuntu => hv-kvp-daemon-init (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078106 Title: [MIR] hv-kvp-daemon-init To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:/