[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2013-01-17 Thread Thorsteinn A. Malmjursson
Have changed this back to opinion from incomplete - it's not incomplete - it describes the problem, gives an opinion (that the package should be junked since it's effectively useless) and it does need to be dealt with. Either that or 13.04 will go out with this package still on, still broken, and

Re: [Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-21 Thread Paul Brossier
Hi, Sorry for the late reply, I am on the road... Unfortunately, I would agree with kino's removal, it has been mostly abandoned, and I don't really have time to fix its many bugs myself. It would be nice to have a smooth transition though, marking it as obsolete before removing it. But I don't

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-15 Thread Karma Dorje
the program has no serious bugs (in security) and while she did not trashed from the ports of gentoo. Ubuntu sponsors is appropriate so that an Ubuntu dev has a chance to review the request before it enters the Archive Admin's queue. In this case, I reviewed it and asked the Debian maintainer f

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-14 Thread Micah Gersten
Ubuntu sponsors is appropriate so that an Ubuntu dev has a chance to review the request before it enters the Archive Admin's queue. In this case, I reviewed it and asked the Debian maintainer for advice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-14 Thread Thorsteinn A. Malmjursson
Thanks Dmitry. I was instructed by ScottK to add the Ubuntu Sponsors team to this report, so if it wasn't supposed to be here, don't blame me :) I was doing what I was told with something I didn't understand. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-14 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
There is a lot of bugs for you in Debian BTS: http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?include=severity%3Aimportant;package=kino. I agree that we shouldn't remove it here if it's fixable, but I also do agree that the package is broken. -- The sponsors team has no reason to be subscribed to

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-14 Thread Karma Dorje
** Changed in: kino (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069514 Title: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors To manage n

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-14 Thread Karma Dorje
# ChangeLog for media-video/kino # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2 # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-video/kino/ChangeLog,v 1.130 2012/05/15 03:47:52 lu_zero Exp $ 15 May 2012; Luca Barbato kino-1.3.4.ebuild, +files/kino-1.3.4-libav-0.8.patch: Update su

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-10 Thread Karma Dorje
** Changed in: kino (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069514 Title: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors To manage notif

[Bug 1069514] Re: Request for kino package to be removed from ubuntu mirrors

2012-11-09 Thread Micah Gersten
Paul, as the Debian maintainer, could you please comment as to whether or not kino is working in Debian and/or fixable? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069514 Title: Request for kino