Bug did not expire due to bug watch
Upstream issue showing "RESOLVED WORKSFORME" on 2017-07-21
Reporter said upstream "secure communication has been working fine"
No comments here for six years so closing
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received th
Hello Rolf
Thank you for submitting this bug and reporting a problem with Thunderbird.
You made this bug report in 2012 and there have been several versions of
Ubuntu and Thunderbird since then.
Could you confirm that this is no longer a problem and that we can close the
ticket?
Or, if it is sti
** Changed in: thunderbird
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066585
Title:
[Regression] Cacert CA certified certificate no longer recognized
To mana
What inforamtio are you needing?
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066585
Title:
[Regression] Cacert CA certified c
Is there any update avaialble here besinde of talking about who might
and might not did any wrong? It's really annoying to to have a chance to
trust a cacert cert with a fresh profile.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Micah, please read #32 again. I think you misunderstood me. I was
talking about myself, not Chris. And I still would not know how to
change the setting in TB (or verify the current setting). In any case,
that's not relevant because as I found out my certificate does not use
md5.
--
You receive
No, he said the setting is the same in TB and I verified last night he
was correct.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066585
Title:
[Regression] Cacert CA certified certificate no longe
The response of essentially "I don't know where to change this setting
so as to apply to TB" was given on the same day the question was asked.
That answer hasn't changed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
He didn't "not take responsibility" per se. He asked that he not be
assigned tasks without a consult and asked a question in an attempt to
help you debug your issue. I believe that's perfectly reasonable. He
didn't get a response for two months, and when one was posted, that
response was that h
Micah, thanks for stepping in. No worry, I am perfectly calm. And I am
not trying to blame anyone for the work they do, it's much appreciated.
I am certainly aware that Mozilla is a huge project and that there is
always a big possibility of regressions slipping through (which in fact
is why I pin
Rolf, let's keep things calm here. Mozilla's rapid release schedule
introduces the possibility of more frequent regressions. We try to the
extent possible to test for common scenarios that might impact a normal
workflow. Obviously we can't catch everything. Even though Chris did
the upload here
In all of the FOSS projects that I was involved with so far a good
principle being adhered to was "you break it, you fix it"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066585
Title:
[Regression]
"Whether it was me who uploaded the package or not is irrelevant." I
see. So, Ubuntu is now at the point where you no longer have to take
responsibility if you screw things up? Great! Just great! Way to go.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #650355
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650355
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #802699
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802699
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Whether it was me who uploaded the package or not is irrelevant.
And the setting is applicable to both Firefox and Thunderbird
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066585
Title:
[Regressi
Chris, I assigned this to you since you uploaded the regression. That
seems fair to me. Under other circumstances I would not assign a
ticket.
Upstream bug tracker talks about security.enable_md5_signatures but it
seems this is a Firefox setting, not one for TB.
--
You received this bug notifi
Please do not assign bugs to me without asking me first. It implies that
you've made a decision for me on how I should prioritize a task, and you
have no idea of what my current workload is. This is incredibly rude
Anyway, does this work with security.enable_md5_signatures set to true?
** Changed
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066585
Title:
Launchpad has imported 9 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=800876.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://hel
** Description changed:
There is a fairly serious regression from thunderbird
15.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 to 1:16.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1. The
later version apparently no longer recognizes the Cacert CA whereas the
former does. I use a self-signed cert for my mail-server with a key
20 matches
Mail list logo
