** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
Please mark as fix released once the package has successfully built.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 05:24:09 -0400
Source: clamav
Binary: clamav libclamav-dev clamav-dbg clamav-milter clamav-base
clamav-freshclam clamav-testfiles clamav-daemon li
Ok, in light of the information above regarding support for 0.90.1 being
disabled on 16 Apr '07, let's move immediately on this.
+1.
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug noti
+1 from me, based on it being a bug fix release, and that upstream will
disable support for 0.90.1
(http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20070413.012951.1d50edff.en.html)
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Stupid Treo truncates the response
... for the two CVEs fixed in 0.90.2. At this point I think it's
probably lower risk to take their entire (tested) 0.90.2 release than to
try an cherry pick out the fixes for the two CVEs. Either way I'm glad
I'm not the one that has to decide.
--
UVFe fo
If you want to hold this for backports, then I think someone (other than
me because I don't know enough) needs to look at patching our 0.90.1
packages for the two CVEs fixeD
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Sorry, meant "Feisty" above to be Feisty backports.
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubunt
I think this would be a good idea for Feisty. What does the security
team (Kees?) think?
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Correction and update Klamav uses clamav, not clamav daemon.
libclamav2 also gets used. The Klamav test succesfully found the test
files included with the clamav package.
Have now built the package on a second Feisty i386 computer and run
clamv (libclamav2, clamav-base, freshclam, and clamav
Debs for all packages built and installed on i386. Tested clamav-base,
clamav-daemon, and freshclam with Klamav with no issues.
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU UVF Team
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug noti
diffstat
** Attachment added: "diffstat"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7326294/diffstat.txt
--
UVFe for clamav 0.90.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106357
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
11 matches
Mail list logo