[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-08-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package debootstrap - 1.0.20ubuntu1.6 --- debootstrap (1.0.20ubuntu1.6) lucid; urgency=low * Stop at the end of the retrieval phase if any packages failed to download (LP: #1023069). debootstrap (1.0.20ubuntu1.5) lucid-proposed; urgency=low * Fix Pa

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-08-16 Thread Louis Bouchard
Verified the uploaded fix in -proposed using steps described in the "Test case" paragraph. upload does fix the issue ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-08-08 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hello Niklas, or anyone else affected, Accepted debootstrap into lucid-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/1.0.20ubuntu1.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See ht

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-08-08 Thread Colin Watson
This works as far as it goes, but if a download keeps failing then debootstrap will carry on without it and claim to have succeeded. This is something I fixed in Debian 1.0.39 along with the change Louis backported here - although not in the same commit, which may be why he missed it - and I think

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-07-05 Thread Colin Watson
Hello Niklas, or anyone else affected, Accepted debootstrap into lucid-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/1.0.20ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See ht

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-04-18 Thread Chris J Arges
** Tags removed: cts-client-review -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 Title: Packages was corrupt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-04-17 Thread Chris J Arges
** Tags added: cts-client-review -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 Title: Packages was corrupt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-04-02 Thread Louis Bouchard
oups, sorry about that :-/ I thought that the upload msg from laney was sufficient. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 Title: Packages was corrupt To manage notifications about t

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Please do not change bug status to those that contradict SRU workflow. "Fix committed" should only be set by SRU team once the package is accepted into -proposed pocket. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure for description of status changes for SRUs. ** Changed in: debootstra

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-03-22 Thread Louis Bouchard
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 Title: Packages was corrupt To manage notifications about

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-03-21 Thread Iain Lane
Uploaded to Lucid. Removing sponsors - thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 Title: Packages was corrupt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-03-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
as far as I understand this is fixed in precise and up, or at least in raring hence marking the default task "fix released". ** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-15 Thread Louis Bouchard
Important to note : the upstream debian commit required changing references to $checksum and verify_checksum used in more recent versions by $md5 and check_md5 which was in use in version 1.0.20 ** Patch added: "debootstrap_1.0.20ubuntu1.5.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deb

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-15 Thread Louis Bouchard
** Description changed: + SRU justification : + Without this fix, unattended installation using preseed/kickstart files for 10.04.4 fails with a red screen and the message "Packages was corrupt" + + Impact : + Impossible to preform unattended preseed installation in 10.04.4 + + Fix : + Backpo

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: debootstrap (Debian) Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 Title: Packages was corrupt To manage notifications about this bug g

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-13 Thread Louis Bouchard
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 Title: Packages was corrupt To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-13 Thread Peter Matulis
** Also affects: debootstrap (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618920 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-13 Thread Louis Bouchard
marking Precise as fixed released since the correction is in precise- updates already For lucid, a backport of 1.0.39 will be required. Please be aware that this will not fix a situation where the .iso file is used as an archive since the .iso will always use debootstrap from the .iso ** Changed

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-13 Thread Chris J Arges
** Also affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-02-13 Thread Louis Bouchard
Regarding precise, this bug has been fixed in Debian/upstream by the following bug : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618920 It was included in Precise in version 1.0.39 which is in the precise- updates archive : http://packages.ubuntu.com/fr/precise-updates/debootstrap ** Chan

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-01-23 Thread Adam Stokes
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2013-01-17 Thread Matt Rae
Expected Behavior: Installer continues without warning about a corrupt Packages file. Behavior actually encountered: During install a red warning screen appears with the following message: [!!] Install the base system Debootstrap warning Warning: http://192.168.0.1/ubuntu/dists/lucid/restricte

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2012-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for debian-installer (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2012-08-13 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Problem with internet (e.g. fake internet redirect to login page) or borked up mirror. Try offline installation or a different mirror / network. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023069 T

[Bug 1023069] Re: Packages was corrupt

2012-08-11 Thread Fabio Marconi
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs