[Bug 1004320] Re: "inet6 static" does not get brought up on boot

2014-03-21 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004320 Title: "inet6 static" does not get brought up on boot To manage notific

[Bug 1004320] Re: "inet6 static" does not get brought up on boot

2013-02-28 Thread Andrew Shadura
Probably fixed in the newer versions, could the reported please re- check? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004320 Title: "inet6 static" does not get brought up on boot To manage noti

[Bug 1004320] Re: "inet6 static" does not get brought up on boot

2012-06-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004320 Title: "inet

[Bug 1004320] Re: "inet6 static" does not get brought up on boot

2012-05-28 Thread Philipp Wollermann
I tried without "privext 0" and it works fine :) So the needed fix seems to be: First change the privacy extension to 0 (and possibly also the other flags, like accept_ra) and then assign the static address to the interface, not the other way round. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1004320] Re: "inet6 static" does not get brought up on boot

2012-05-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
I noticed on a system that the kernel tends to flush the addresses on privacy extension change. Did you try without the "privext 0" bit? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004320 Title: