Thanks all!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886092
Title:
libreoffice doesn't list gpg private key for a digital signature due
to apparmor
To manage notifications about this bug go
Public bug reported:
LibreOffice should be able to digitally sign a document with a GPG
private key in the GPG key chain. However, the key is not listed in the
list of certificates shown following the menu File - Digital Signatures
- Digital Signatures... - Sign Document..., after, e.g., creating
I have seemingly similar problem on Intel NUC DE3815TYKHE (ntel Atom CPU
E3815). On 4.15.*, it takes more than 5 minutes to unpack the initramfs
(below is an example on 4.15.0-36). With the acpi=noirq, the kernel
boots as usual.
$ dmesg | head -2; dmesg | grep -A1 initramfs
[ 0.00] Linux versi
in the dictionary). This
could be fixed when I added skkdic package: sudo apt-get install skkdic.
Could you please modify fcitx-skk so that it depends upon skkdic?
Thanks,
zunda
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 15.04
Release:15.04
$ apt-cache policy fcitx-skk skkdic
fcitx-skk:
** Attachment added: "A sample JPG that seems to have the `Date and Time
(original)' tag"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libexif-ruby/+bug/1054456/+attachment/3330406/+files/IMG_20120914_194443.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
** Attachment added: "A sample JPG that does not seem to have the `Date and
Time (original)' tag"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libexif-ruby/+bug/1054456/+attachment/3330404/+files/IMG_20110205_142604.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
** Patch added: "A patch that seems to fix the problem"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054456/+attachment/3330399/+files/fix-notag.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054456
Tit
Public bug reported:
Some JPG files does not have certain EXIF information. For EXIF tags
that does not exist, Exif#[] seems to be expected to return nil.
Instead, a random string is returned:
$ irb1.8
irb(main):001:0> require 'exif'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> Exif.new('IMG_20110205_142604.jpg')['
