Re: [Bug 313952] Re: Boa Constructor Inspector Window unusable on 64-bit Hardy

2009-04-11 Thread dr.moe
Hi Luca, Thanks for this, will test asap :) Regards, Dr. Moe Le samedi 11 avril 2009 à 16:18 +, Luca Falavigna a écrit : > Fixed in boa-constructor 0.6.1-6, just uploaded in Debian. > > ** Changed in: boa-constructor (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Medium > > ** Changed in: boa-co

Re: [Bug 313956] Re: Boa Constructor won't use python-wxgtk v2.8

2009-04-11 Thread dr.moe
Hi Luca, Thanks for making this clear. Sorry for not replying to your question sooner, I got overbooked. Regards, Dr. Moe Le samedi 11 avril 2009 à 14:08 +, Luca Falavigna a écrit : > Actually, boa-constrcuctor depends on python-wxgtk v2.6 since it has not > been tested with 2.8, so it's b

Re: [Bug 85014] Re: Fail to enter rc1.d by putting 1 in bootparam in edgy

2009-02-11 Thread dr.moe
Le mardi 10 février 2009 à 14:30 +, Scott James Remnant a écrit : > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:33 +0000, dr.moe wrote: > > > can't believe Scott James Remnant once wrote "This should be fixed > > upstream" (in telinit ! ). > > > Scott James Remna

Re: [Bug 85014] Re: Fail to enter rc1.d by putting 1 in bootparam in edgy

2009-02-05 Thread dr.moe
Hi all, can't believe Scott James Remnant once wrote "This should be fixed upstream" (in telinit ! ). Well, it still works for any other distro, and I bet you'd get a good laugh from the upstream folks if they came across this, which they may have since this issue came up a VERY long time ago. Thi

[Bug 319406] Re: runlevel not passed to init scripts

2009-01-20 Thread dr.moe
Hello, Up This should actually be phrased as upstart MUST support various runlevels. Went the same path as Marco Ciampa, and achieved the same results. In the current offer, upstart only has support dor the built-in recovery mode plus ONE runlevel. This is a nonstandard behaviour which causes pe

Re: [Bug 313960] Re: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46

2009-01-18 Thread dr.moe
Hello Thierry and Team, Thanks for taking a little more time to explain. Nonetheless, perhaps the most important point is still missing from your answer. Please see below. Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 17:28 +, Thierry Carrez a écrit : > > It makes it look like Ubuntu LTS is not even strivin

Re: [Bug 313960] Re: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46

2009-01-06 Thread dr.moe
2009 à 15:44 +, Mathias Gug a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:38PM -, dr.moe wrote: > > _Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the > > regular LTS repos ? > > > > So please let me know if inclusion in the main Hardy repos could

Re: [Bug 313960] Re: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46

2009-01-05 Thread dr.moe
Hi Thierry, Thanks for forwarding. Looking forward to the backporters' response. _Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the regular LTS repos ? I must stress again that this would be an important improvement for LTS. To summarize: - if any dnsmasq user wants / need

[Bug 313952] [NEW] Boa Constructor Inspector Window unusable on 64-bit Hardy

2009-01-05 Thread dr.moe
Public bug reported: Inspector unusable - OverflowError - 0.6.1 on Linux 64 bit Clicking on any numerical property in the inspector to change it results in the attached error. The Inspector's property field never opens ; the value it contained before clicking is set to null/void/nothing, but reve

[Bug 313952] Re: Boa Constructor Inspector Window unusable on 64-bit Hardy

2009-01-05 Thread dr.moe
** Attachment added: "log.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20910543/log.txt -- Boa Constructor Inspector Window unusable on 64-bit Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 313960] [NEW] Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46

2009-01-05 Thread dr.moe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dnsmasq Hello, Dnsmasq has added support for CNAME directives in the config file starting with version 2.46. This version is not available in Hardy, while I believe a LTS release should deserve this improvement. All alternatives require (to my knowledg

[Bug 313956] [NEW] Boa Constructor won't use python-wxgtk v2.8

2009-01-05 Thread dr.moe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: boa-constructor Hello, The Hardy package for Boa depends on version 2.6 of the wxpython libs. Installing version 2.8 of these libs (which is available in Hardy) makes no difference to Boa. The command line switch for starting Boa with a distinct wx vers

[Bug 313955] [NEW] Improper translation support for Boa Constructor in Hardy

2009-01-05 Thread dr.moe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: boa-constructor Hello, As I was troubleshooting a different issue with Boa Constructor's Inspector window, I eventually ended up installing from upstream source (awkward, I know...). To my surprise, as soon as the source version was installed, all GUI

[Bug 74825] Unreferenced function freezes tar.gz export

2006-12-07 Thread dr.moe
Public bug reported: Hello, The tar.gz export option does not work on my installed version of gcfilms (gcfilms/dapper uptodate 6.0-1) unless line 93 in /usr/share/gcfilms/lib/GCExport/GCExportTarGz.pm is commented out (on my machine, the line reads : #$movie->{image} =

[Bug 74825] Re: Unreferenced function freezes tar.gz export

2006-12-07 Thread dr.moe
** Description changed: Hello, The tar.gz export option does not work on my installed version of gcfilms (gcfilms/dapper uptodate 6.0-1) unless line 93 in /usr/share/gcfilms/lib/GCExport/GCExportTarGz.pm is commented out (on my machine, the line reads : #$movi