[Bug 447197] Re: Packages with custom /etc/sysctl.d/30-foo.conf files can fail to install: start procps returns exit status 1

2009-11-29 Thread dk75
gosh, is my english that really bad? I said that I've done typos posting key name in first post but in sysctl.conf it was without typos. And now it is commented out and that why wine1.2 installed without problem. Problem wasn't a typo because it was only in my message not in sysctl.conf Now rea

[Bug 447197] Re: Packages with custom /etc/sysctl.d/30-foo.conf files can fail to install: start procps returns exit status 1

2009-11-29 Thread dk75
Sorry, it was typo on my side when I've wroted message on launchpad. It is really "vm.mmap_min_adr" adn commenting it out solved my problem. As I see, install script of wine1.2 installs "/etc/sysctl.d/30-wine.conf" which have "vm.mmap_min_adr=0" key inside so I think it is key duplication error (

[Bug 447197] Re: Packages with custom /etc/sysctl.d/30-foo.conf files can fail to install: start procps returns exit status 1

2009-11-29 Thread dk75
OK. As I see, every one have "vm.nmap_min_adr = 0" key in it's "/etc/sysctl.conf" and almost every one did upgrade from Jaunty. As I have clean install of Karmic on my box then I havent had this key in my "/etc/sysctl.conf" but I've added it in my atempt to run ARMEL crosscompilation on Scratchb

[Bug 489747] Re: no external media is automounted

2009-11-28 Thread dk75
** Attachment added: "udevadm test `udevadm info --query=path --name=/dev/sdf1`" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36209968/udev.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36209969/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.ne

[Bug 489747] [NEW] no external media is automounted

2009-11-28 Thread dk75
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs Whatever I connect isn't automounted. It take awfull of time to be vissible and ready to manual mount but no automount at all. Not USB stick, nor HDD inside USB enclosure, nor SDCard pluged to USB card reader, nor HDD connected trough eSATA, nor CD

[Bug 452000] Re: kerneloops stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1)

2009-11-19 Thread dk75
this is not a "cosmetic issue" a whole LSB system init.d script insertion is falling apart and is useless I wroted a script that stops rtorrent gracefully and want to instert it at INIT 0, 1 and 6 ( halt, silgme-user, reboot ) and configured it with LSB as this: ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides:

[Bug 378525] Re: modprobe: FATAL: could not load /lib/modules/2.6.28-11-generic/modules.dep: No such file or directory (LIES!) then ubuntu boots fine

2009-06-11 Thread dk75
possible workaround http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7312473&postcount=5 -- modprobe: FATAL: could not load /lib/modules/2.6.28-11-generic/modules.dep: No such file or directory (LIES!) then ubuntu boots fine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378525 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 345834] Re: Corrupted preferences dialog in Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (recent update)

2009-03-29 Thread dk75
Same here - 2.0.0.21 brakes user interface 3 first menu entry isn't visible, shortcut is mismatched, for example "cursorr arrow down" deletes messages, "K" key try to cancel nntp message instead of ignoring thread... ** Attachment added: "bug-345834-01.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/244776

[Bug 345834] Re: Corrupted preferences dialog in Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (recent update)

2009-03-29 Thread dk75
** Attachment added: "bug-345834-03.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24477692/bug-345834-03.png -- Corrupted preferences dialog in Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (recent update) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 345834] Re: Corrupted preferences dialog in Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (recent update)

2009-03-29 Thread dk75
** Attachment added: "bug-345834-02.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24477687/bug-345834-02.png -- Corrupted preferences dialog in Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (recent update) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 132039] Re: [gutsy] /etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter exited with return code 2

2009-03-18 Thread dk75
Firestarter aren't supported by Ubuntu devs anymore so I doub't that it will be resolved or gain high priority. UFW is right now supported and recommended by Ubuntu devs and it have no such trouble. -- [gutsy] /etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter exited with return code 2 https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 302940] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-9-generic 2.6.27-9.19 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2008-11-29 Thread dk75
So what if apparmor fils bugreport, sends it (n.b. it includes anything that you request on this site for bug report but user cannot save it to disk and send it here) and then opens browser and load this bug.launchpad site? Is it a bug or not? And how the user could know? -- package linux-image-

[Bug 302940] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-9-generic 2.6.27-9.19 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2008-11-28 Thread dk75
Florian: No need for a new bug report. I've followed the "grub" trail and figured it out to be new handling for "default saved" entry - no problem after proper reconfiguration from 7.10 config to 8.10 config. -- package linux-image-2.6.27-9-generic 2.6.27-9.19 failed to install/upgrade: subproc

[Bug 302940] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-9-generic 2.6.27-9.19 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2008-11-27 Thread dk75
I second that. Intrepid Ibex 8.10, GNOME, 64bit $ sudo update-grub Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Searching for default file ... found: /boot/grub/default Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... found

[Bug 132039] Re: [gutsy] /etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter exited with return code 2

2008-10-14 Thread dk75
In Hardy is ufw already (ufw is a middleman between IPTABLES and user - like Firestarter, but it's shell command tool) and with gufw (GUI - Gnome ufw) it's really nice. I've tested it on 8.10 thought, but it should be gufw for Hardy too (I've seen it with Polish edition 8.04.1 so search for gufw at

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-10-04 Thread dk75
Ah, OK. I have libgnutls.so.26 but... 64bit version (/usr/lib -> /usr/lib64). Only 32bit repo available version are 13. Now after Wubuntish@ tutorial FlashPlayer10rc2 works to me too. -- [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257403 You received thi

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-10-02 Thread dk75
I have libgnutls26 from the beggining and flash10rc2 not work for me - I have grey window instead. -- [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-09-28 Thread dk75
It not work at all. Nor with package from psyk83 nor with hand wrapped one from adobe. -- [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-09-28 Thread dk75
But I have already symlinks for that: /usr/lib/libssl3.so -> /usr/lib/libssl3.so.1d /usr/lib/libnss3.so -> /usr/lib/libnss3.so.1d /usr/lib/libsmime3.so -> /usr/lib/libsmime3.so.1d Copying it shouldn't do any change. I will check it and yes I have 10r2 form psyk83 and I've tryed add flash maually

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-09-23 Thread dk75
Exact version flashplayer-nonfre is "10.0.12.10ubuntu1~ppa3" When I try to do "nspluginwrapper" on adobe copy of "libflashplayer.so" ,then result is this same. And no any trace in DMESG about nspluginwrapper and some library lack. Only npviewer.bin but it's only durring actual playback tryout: [

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-09-23 Thread dk75
"dmesg | tail" seconds after installation flashplugin10.0.12.2~ppa3 shows nothing interesting It have ony something after flash playback atempt: [ 854.869163] npviewer.bin[7058]: segfault at 0 ip sp ff8ec99c error 14 in npviewer.bin[8048000+1a000] [ 873.655534] npviewer

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-09-23 Thread dk75
Making "/etc/adobe/mms.config" with "WindowlessDisable=true" not doing any good. Still, flash animations don't plays with 10.0 r12 -- [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-09-23 Thread dk75
flashplayer 10.0.r12 As for DMESG - I'm not with 8.10 right now but I will check it out - durring installation right? Conn@ OK, will check "/etc/adobe/mms.cfg" -- [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257403 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 257403] Re: [Intrepid] FFe request for Flash 10 RC2 (10.0.12.10)

2008-09-23 Thread dk75
newest flashplugin-nonfree from Conn PPA (launchpad psyke83) don't work properly on Ibex64 Flash movies aren't played at all 2 pisc which should explain it: http://premium.fileden.com/premium/2006/12/11/497871/misc/ubuntu/Ibex/flashplugin10rc2PPA-01.png http://premium.fileden.com/premium/2006/12/

[Bug 205665] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-09-23 Thread dk75
I have the same as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intrepid64, 2.6.27-3 It was first thing that crashed after clean install alpha6 (along with nautilius). Then after package update it crashed again during startup. Thes lines are from "dmesg | tail": [ 46.142402] NET: Registered protocol family 10 [ 46.1465

[Bug 132039] Re: [gutsy] /etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter exited with return code 2

2008-04-29 Thread dk75
So... the problem is that networking is starting before filesystem is up and running (and Firestarter with it). -- [gutsy] /etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter exited with return code 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 132039] Re: [gutsy] /etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter exited with return code 2

2008-02-09 Thread dk75
Or, it will be better to edit "/etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter" form this: [code] #! /bin/sh /etc/init.d/firestarter restart [/code] to this: [code] #! /bin/sh if [ "$(/etc/init.d/firestarter status | grep running)" ]; then /etc/init.d/firestarter restart; else /etc/init.d/firestarter start;

[Bug 132039] Re: [gutsy] /etc/network/if-up.d/50firestarter exited with return code 2

2008-02-09 Thread dk75
OK. So I will write what's happening. Everybody, look inside yours "/etc/rcS.d" directory - which priority have "networking" and which "firestarter"? At my system it is respectively 40 and 65. It means that first "/etc/init.d/networking" is running and with that "/etc/network/if-up.d/50firestart